Correspondence |

Proportion of Cases of Perforated Appendicitis: A Bad Measure of Quality of Care

Roland Erik Andersson, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):885-886. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.168.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their analysis of the quality of the health care system in US counties, Camp et al1 analyzed the proportion of cases of perforated appendicitis in children as a measure of the quality of surgical care and found that counties with the highest density of pediatricians had the lowest proportion of perforations. No association was found for other providers or health care facility factors.

Camp et al1 assume that a high proportion of perforations is an indication of the low quality of the health care system. However, this may be very misleading. The proportion of cases of perforated appendicitis is positively related to the number of perforations and inversely related to the number of cases of nonperforated appendicitis. There is now clear evidence that perforation can rarely be prevented and that spontaneous resolution of nonperforated appendicitis is common.2 Variations in the proportion of perforations is therefore mainly determined by variations in the incidence rate of nonperforated appendicitis, whereas the incidence rate of perforated appendicitis is stable over different health care systems.3 An increase in the use of health care and diagnostic techniques can explain the recent report of an increasing incidence rate of nonperforated appendicitis in the United States.4,5 A low proportion of perforations is therefore most probably an indication of a higher consumption of health care leading to more operations for mild appendicitis that would otherwise resolve. The proportion of perforations is therefore a bad measure of the quality of care. I would advice future investigators of this issue to use population-based data and analyze the results as incidence rates.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





July 1, 2011
Fizan Abdullah, MD, PhD; Dominic Papandria, MD; Melissa Camp, MD, MPH
Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):885-886. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.169.
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter e23. How to Use an Article About Quality Improvement