Recently, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association issued a combined position statement in response to the new guidelines from the American Board of Surgery (ABS) requiring a minimum of 50 colonoscopies and 35 upper endoscopic procedures to be performed by a resident to complete a surgical residency.1 These gastroenterologic societies purport to be concerned about the quality of training after such experience and therefore believe that endoscopy should categorically be removed from surgical training and possibly from surgical practice altogether.1 As educators of the next generation of surgeons, we are bewildered by the position of this alliance. We wonder if motives other than competency and patient safety underlie their statement. For critical analysis, one must address 3 intertwined issues: the rationale for this statement, adult learning theory, and endoscopic privileging in clinical practice.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Surgery editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 3
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Can the Clinical History Distinguish Between Organic and Functional Dyspepsia?
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.