0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Feature |

Image of the Month—Diagnosis FREE

Arch Surg. 2011;146(8):988. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.183-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The patient was clinically diagnosed with typhoid perforation of the ileum. The diagnosis was confirmed by a Widal serology test. A peritoneal toilet and simple transverse closure of the perforation were performed. The patient was discharged home on the 10th postoperative day in good condition.

Although Salmonella typhi infection causing typhoid fever has become rare in the United States and other developed nations in recent decades, it continues to be a major health problem throughout most of the developing world, particularly in Africa. Typhoid bacilli gain entrance to the body via ingestion of foods or liquids contaminated with infected feces or urine. They are not destroyed by gastric acidity and reach the bloodstream after successfully invading the intestinal mucosa and navigating intestinal lymphatics and mesenteric lymph nodes. A severe complication and a frequent cause for death from typhoid is perforation of ileal ulcerations arising from necrosis of the Peyer patches in the terminal ileum, although the jejunum and cecum may also be involved. The Peyer patches undergo swelling and ulceration, which can evolve into capillary thrombosis and subsequent necrosis. These ulcerations are always located on the antimesenteric border of the intestine and may perforate or bleed, usually in the third week of the disease. The reported mortality rates of 20% to 60% associated with this complication are especially high when considering the young age of many of the patients.1,2 Furthermore, the increased incidence of S typhi infections in patients with AIDS raises the possibility of a resurgence of typhoid fever in the developed world.3 In areas where typhoid is endemic, the diagnosis of typhoid perforation can usually be made without difficulty based on a clinical history extending over a period of 1 to 4 weeks and culminating in an acute picture of enteric perforation. The physical findings are typical of diffused peritonitis following a perforated viscus, and roentgenologic studies will reveal a pneumoperitoneum in about two-thirds of cases. This intraoperative finding is so characteristic of typhoid perforation that diagnosis can be based on this alone.4 Perforations, generally single, appear as “punched-out” holes on the antimesenteric border of the terminal ileum. Widal serology test results are positive in 20% to 75% of cases5 but are frequently negative early in the course of the disease.6 The antibiotic of choice for S typhi infection is chloramphenicol. This drug has great efficacy in nonperforated typhoid fever and may decrease the incidence of perforation. The treatment of typhoid ileal perforations, however, remains somewhat controversial. A variety of surgical procedures have been recommended. In moribund patients, simple drainage of the peritoneum under local anesthesia may be all that is feasible. The most common definitive treatment for nonmoribund patients has been debridement with a simple transverse closure of the perforation in either 1 or 2 layers.7 More aggressive treatment in the form of wedge resection8 or small-bowel resection9 has been recommended. Most authors recommend resection only for severely damaged bowel whereas others use it for multiple perforations.10 All operative procedures reported are followed by a high complication rate, which is explained by a combination of massive peritonitis and poor patient resistance.

Until typhoid fever is eliminated by improved sanitation and immunization programs, surgeons will be confronted with its complications in developing nations. Of these, enteric perforation is the most common and lethal. Only prompt recognition and urgent surgical intervention will improve results.

Return to Quiz Case.

Correspondence: Julien Jarry, MD, Hopital Principal, Avenue Mandela, Dakar, 33000, Senegal (julienjarry@hotmail.com).

Accepted for Publication: April 14, 2011.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Jarry, Ogougbemy, and Diouf. Acquisition of data: Tine. Drafting of the manuscript: Jarry, Tine, Ogougbemy, and Diouf. Study supervision: Jarry, Tine, Ogougbemy, and Diouf.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Archampong EQ. Typhoid ileal perforations: why such mortalities?  Br J Surg. 1976;63(4):317-321
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Eggleston FC, Santoshi B, Singh CM. Typhoid perforation of the bowel: experiences in 78 cases.  Ann Surg. 1979;190(1):31-35
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Gotuzzo E, Frisancho O, Sanchez J,  et al.  Association between the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and infection with Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi in an endemic typhoid area.  Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(2):381-382
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Kim JP, Oh SK, Jarrett F. Management of ileal perforation due to typhoid fever.  Ann Surg. 1975;181(1):88-91
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Chouhan MK, Pande SK. Typhoid enteric perforation.  Br J Surg. 1982;69(3):173-175
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Archampong EQ. Operative treatment of typhoid perforation of the bowel.  Br Med J. 1969;3(5665):273-276
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Dawson JH. Surgical management of typhoid perforation of the ileum.  Am Surg. 1970;36(10):620-622
PubMed
Welch TP, Martin NC. Surgical treatment of typhoid perforation.  Lancet. 1975;1(7915):1078-1080
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rathore AH, Khan IA, Saghir W. Prognostic indices of typhoid perforation.  Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987;81(3):283-289
PubMed
Efem SE, Asindi AA, Aja A. Recent advances in the management of typhoid enteric perforation in children.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1986;31(4):214-217
PubMed

Figures

Tables

References

Archampong EQ. Typhoid ileal perforations: why such mortalities?  Br J Surg. 1976;63(4):317-321
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Eggleston FC, Santoshi B, Singh CM. Typhoid perforation of the bowel: experiences in 78 cases.  Ann Surg. 1979;190(1):31-35
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Gotuzzo E, Frisancho O, Sanchez J,  et al.  Association between the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and infection with Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi in an endemic typhoid area.  Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(2):381-382
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Kim JP, Oh SK, Jarrett F. Management of ileal perforation due to typhoid fever.  Ann Surg. 1975;181(1):88-91
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Chouhan MK, Pande SK. Typhoid enteric perforation.  Br J Surg. 1982;69(3):173-175
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Archampong EQ. Operative treatment of typhoid perforation of the bowel.  Br Med J. 1969;3(5665):273-276
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Dawson JH. Surgical management of typhoid perforation of the ileum.  Am Surg. 1970;36(10):620-622
PubMed
Welch TP, Martin NC. Surgical treatment of typhoid perforation.  Lancet. 1975;1(7915):1078-1080
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Rathore AH, Khan IA, Saghir W. Prognostic indices of typhoid perforation.  Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987;81(3):283-289
PubMed
Efem SE, Asindi AA, Aja A. Recent advances in the management of typhoid enteric perforation in children.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1986;31(4):214-217
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles