0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.17.174.94. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Special Feature |

Image of the Month—Diagnosis FREE

Arch Surg. 2011;146(8):990. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.182-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ANSWER: ISOLATED COMMON HEPATIC DUCT INJURY WITH ANOMALOUS RIGHT HEPATIC DUCT ANATOMY

Subsequent operative exploration of the common bile duct in this patient demonstrated an anomalous right posterior sectoral hepatic duct that inserted inferior to the cystic duct. Multiple laparoscopic surgical clips occluded the common hepatic duct at the level of the junction between the left hepatic and right anterior sectoral ducts. During operation, choledochoscopy (Figure 3) was performed to confirm the biliary anatomy. Operative repair involved excision of the extrahepatic bile ducts, cholangioplasty of the right posterior and common hepatic ducts, and reconstruction of biliary continuity with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Occlusion of the common hepatic duct (CHD) with a patent anomalous right posterior sectoral hepatic duct (RPHD) during intraoperative choledochoscopy.

Although concurrent diagnoses (anxiety, depression, and chronic back pain) complicated the clinical picture, our patient's chronic symptomatic biliary stricture resulted from a bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy more than 1 year prior. The expected rate of bile duct injury following this procedure approximates 0.4%.1 This represents a 2- to 4-fold increased risk over open cholecystectomy.1 Although few injuries (less than one-third) are identified during the initial operation, most are detected within either 30 days or 1 year.2 Patients with delayed diagnoses are typically readmitted to the hospital with mild symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and low-grade abdominal pain. Injuries are most frequently (97%) the direct result of visual perception illusions by the surgeon.3

Thorough preoperative cholangiography that completely defines all bile duct anatomy is essential for a successful reconstruction following major bile duct injuries.4 Patients also frequently have poor quality of life until the injury is repaired.5 Even after successful reconstruction, however, patient scores remain lower in psychological domains (but not social or physical domains) compared with healthy controls. Our case displays a typically underappreciated pattern of major bile duct injury. This patient benefited from an anomalous right posterior sectoral hepatic duct that inserted inferior to the common hepatic duct injury.

Return to Quiz Case.

Submissions

The Editor welcomes contributions to the Image of the Month. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission and review system (http://manuscripts.archsurg.com). Articles and photographs accepted will bear the contributor's name. Manuscript criteria and information are per the Instructions for Authors for Archives of Surgery (http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/misc/ifora.dtl). No abstract is needed, and the manuscript should be no more than 3 typewritten pages. There should be a brief introduction, 1 multiple-choice question with 4 possible answers, and the main text. No more than 2 photographs should be submitted. There is no charge for reproduction and printing of color illustrations.

Correspondence: Chad G. Ball, MD, 545 Barnhill Dr, Emerson Hall 203, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (ball.chad@gmail.com).

Accepted for Publication: April 29, 2010.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Acquisition of data: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Analysis and interpretation of data: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Drafting of the manuscript: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Statistical analysis: Ball and Lillemoe. Obtained funding: Ball and Lillemoe. Administrative, technical, and material support: Ball, House, and Lillemoe. Study supervision: Ball, House, and Lillemoe.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Lillemoe KD. Current management of bile duct injury.  Br J Surg. 2008;95(4):403-405
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lillemoe KD, Martin SA, Cameron JL,  et al.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.  Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):459-471
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W,  et al.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.  Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):460-469
PubMed
Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors that influence the results of treatment.  Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123-1129
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.  Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):888-895
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Occlusion of the common hepatic duct (CHD) with a patent anomalous right posterior sectoral hepatic duct (RPHD) during intraoperative choledochoscopy.

Tables

References

Lillemoe KD. Current management of bile duct injury.  Br J Surg. 2008;95(4):403-405
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Lillemoe KD, Martin SA, Cameron JL,  et al.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.  Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):459-471
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W,  et al.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.  Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):460-469
PubMed
Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors that influence the results of treatment.  Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123-1129
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.  Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):888-895
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics