0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

The 0.9% Solution?  Comment on “Maneuvers to Decrease Laparoscopy-Induced Shoulder and Upper Abdominal Pain”

David W. Rattner, MD
Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1366-1367. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.299.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Laparoscopic surgery, once the cutting edge of gastrointestinal tract and general surgery, is now routine and the search is on for the next breakthrough in minimally invasive surgery. Be it natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery or single-site surgery, the holy grail is reducing pain and speeding recovery. Whether these new techniques can live up to expectations is an open question. Furthermore, the current health care environment's pressures to reduce cost combined with sociopolitical forces such as overly restrictive conflict-of-interest policies have put a chill on device development. Improved cosmesis alone is unlikely to justify adoption of new procedures. Payers are demanding evidence-based justification for coverage of new procedures. Given this climate, it is clear that a critical element for advancing surgical care is the value equation. Value is defined as quality divided by cost. Clearly we will have to do more with less or do better with what we already have if we are to meet this challenge.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();