Invited Critique |

Experience Be a Jewel:  Comment on “The Perforated Duodenal Diverticulum”

Patricia Eubanks May, MD
Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):88. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.1012.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Thorson et al2 describe 4 cases of perforated duodenal diverticula that they successfully managed nonoperatively and also present an update of the world literature on the subject. Their report is quite helpful as an encouragement to surgeons who encounter this uncommon entity to try the nonoperative approach. Although the authors were wise not to extrapolate too much from the series of case reports, one wonders what factors contribute to successful nonoperative management. Their review found no significant difference in clinical presentations of the operative compared with the nonoperative groups. This finding is not surprising because duodenal diverticular perforations are difficult to distinguish from other more common upper abdominal conditions. Once again, the multisection helical computed tomography scan makes the diagnosis. Perhaps the finding of peritonitis on examination should prompt operative intervention; however, the authors also found that the observed rate of peritonitis was not statistically different between the operative and nonoperative groups. Can we really believe statistics performed on case reports? I don't think the authors believe it either because they still advise that patients with peritoneal signs and sepsis should be taken “promptly for operative intervention.” That is good surgical common sense speaking. With their track record of successful nonoperative experience, I’m listening.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles