We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Should Nasogastric Tubes Be Removed Early or Late?: That Is the Question Comment on “Effect of Short-term vs Prolonged Nasogastric Decompression on Major Postesophagectomy Complications”

Donald E. Low, MD, FRCSC
Arch Surg. 2012;147(8):752. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1018.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Opinions regarding the surgical treatment and recovery of patients undergoing esophageal resection remain as numerous as the number of surgeons involved in high-volume esophageal practices. Location and technique of the anastomosis, extent of lymph node dissection, whether to include a pyloroplasty or feeding jejunostomy, and nasogastric tube management are a few of the myriad issues for which there is no general consensus. Evidence-based assessments of these issues are few and often underpowered. Mistry and colleagues1 performed a randomized clinical trial that assessed timing of nasogastric tube removal, with the primary end points of pulmonary complications and anastomotic leak and the secondary end points of nasogastric tube reinsertion, patient discomfort scores, and mortality. Previous assessments have compared routine vs no nasogastric tube decompression. However, Mistry et al are correct when they state that most surgeons continue to use nasogastric tube decompression as a routine component of postoperative care, and as a result this well-designed assessment examining the best timing of removal is noteworthy.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Pharyngostomy. Am Surg 2015;81(4):349-53.

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis