0
Original Article |

Improved Prophylaxis and Decreased Rates of Preventable Harm With the Use of a Mandatory Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool for Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma

Elliott R. Haut, MD; Brandyn D. Lau, MPH; Franca S. Kraenzlin, MHS; Deborah B. Hobson, BSN; Peggy S. Kraus, PharmD, CACP; Howard T. Carolan, MPH, MBA; Adil H. Haider, MD, MPH; Christine G. Holzmueller, BLA; David T. Efron, MD; Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Michael B. Streiff, MD
Arch Surg. 2012;147(10):901-907. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.2024.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  Venous thromboembolism is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and is largely preventable. Despite this fact, appropriate prophylaxis is vastly underutilized. To improve compliance with best practice prophylaxis for VTE in hospitalized trauma patients, we implemented a mandatory computerized provider order entry–based clinical decision support tool. The system required completion of checklists of VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. With this tool, we were able to determine a patient's risk stratification level and recommend appropriate prophylaxis. To evaluate the effect of our mandatory computerized provider order entry–based clinical decision support tool on compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE outcomes among admitted adult trauma patients.

Design  Retrospective cohort study (from January 2007 through December 2010).

Setting  University-based, state-designated level 1 adult trauma center.

Patients  A total of 1599 hospitalized adult trauma patients with a hospital length of stay greater than 1 day.

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who were ordered risk-appropriate guideline-suggested VTE prophylaxis. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with any preventable VTE (defined as VTE in a patient not ordered guideline-appropriate VTE prophylaxis), pulmonary embolism, and/or deep vein thrombosis.

Results  Compliance with guideline-appropriate prophylaxis increased from 66.2% to 84.4% (P < .001). The rate of preventable harm from VTE decreased from 1.0% to 0.17% (P = .04).

Conclusions  Implementation of a mandatory computerized provider order entry–based clinical decision support tool significantly improved compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines in hospitalized adult trauma patients. This improved compliance was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of preventable harm, which was defined as VTE events in patients not ordered appropriate prophylaxis.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. Trends in venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and events in hospitalized adult trauma patients. The quarterly compliance rates for prophylaxis orders during the baseline period (2007) and the postimplementation period (2008-2010), in which the mandatory computerized provider order entry–based clinical decision support module was implemented, are compared. Also shown is the downward trend in the annual proportion of patients with VTE events during the same time period. Q indicates quarter.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. Proportion of hospitalized adult trauma patients who received venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. The proportion of hospitalized adult trauma patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis (enoxaparin) are compared with the proportion of hospitalized adult trauma patients who received sequential compression devices (SCDs). The baseline period was 2007, and the postimplementation period was 2008, 2009, and 2010 (when the mandatory computerized provider order entry–based clinical decision support module was implemented).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 3. Compliance rates among hospitalized adult trauma patients, stratified by those with or without documented contraindications to pharmaceutical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. The baseline period was 2007, and the postimplementation period was 2008, 2009, and 2010, in which the mandatory computerized clinical decision support tool was used to increase compliance with prophylaxis ordering.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
Jobs