0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Increased Risk of Mucinous Neoplasm of the Appendix in Adults Undergoing Interval Appendectomy

Matthew J. Furman, MD2; Mitchell Cahan, MD2; Philip Cohen, MD2; Laura A. Lambert, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Surgical Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
2Department of Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. 2013;148(8):703-706. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1212.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  The role of interval appendectomy after conservative management of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Determining the etiology of perforated appendicitis is one reason to perform interval appendectomies.

Objective  To determine whether adult patients undergoing interval appendectomy experience an increased rate of neoplasms.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  A single tertiary care institution.

Participants  All patients 18 years or older who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010.

Exposures  Appendectomy for presumed appendicitis.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Underlying neoplasm as the cause of presentation for presumed appendicitis. Demographic data, clinicopathologic characteristics, interval resection rate, and complication data were collected and analyzed.

Results  During the study period, 376 patients underwent appendectomies. Interval appendectomy was performed in 17 patients (4.5%). Neoplasms were identified in 14 patients (3.7%); 5 of those tumors occurred in patients who had undergone interval appendectomy (29.4%). Nine neoplasms were mucinous tumors (64.3%), including all neoplasms associated with interval appendectomies. The mean age of all patients with appendiceal tumors was 49 years (range, 35-74 years).

Conclusions and Relevance  Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix were found in 5 of 17 patients (29.4%) undergoing interval appendectomy. Interval appendectomies should be considered in all adult patients, especially those 40 years or older, to determine the underlying cause of appendicitis. A multi-institutional study to determine the generalizability of these findings is warranted.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Pathologic Findings in Patients Who Underwent Immediate (n = 359) vs Interval (n = 17) Appendectomy
Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment
when the appendix is more than inflamed.
Posted on June 6, 2013
basil b fadipe
justin fadipe centre. dominica. West Indies
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
This study, small sample evidence as it is, is a welcome alert to revise prevailing instinct that assumes appendicitis always has an inflammatory basis. Though by far the dominant affliction of the clinical appendix is primary inflammation, there are secondary drivers of the inflammation from time to time including midgut carcinoids that should persuade towards removing a clinical appendix as a primary or secondary(interval) procedure.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();