0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Sometimes Consensus and Expert Opinion Is the Best We Can Do

Richard D. Schulick, MD, MBA1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(1):25. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3987.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Brar et al,1 assembling a multidisciplinary expert panel of 16 physicians from 6 countries, follow the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to try to define optimal treatment strategies for gastric adenocarcinoma. The strengths of this process are that it distinguishes between suggested and required care and defines which treatment options may be inappropriate. This study is helpful because it provides a summary of the agreement and disagreement of certain therapeutic options. We must remember that these guidelines are built by current thoughts and procedures and thus are heavily biased. To illustrate this point, had we assembled an expert panel on the use of lumpectomy for breast cancer several decades ago, the results would probably not reflect our current approach, which has been established by multiple high-level randomized clinical trials, some with counterintuitive results.2 Nonetheless, the group does represent a strong body of knowledge and expertise on the subject of gastric cancer and provides a nice summary of the current body of knowledge.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();