0
Editorial |

Innovation in Safety, and Safety in Innovation

Dan Eisenberg, MD1,2; Sherry M. Wren, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
2Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(1):7-9. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5112.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Modern surgery’s heritage has been based on the introduction of innovative approaches to the way surgery was practiced, all in an attempt to improve patient outcomes. Innovations ranged widely from purely technical advances to simple changes in practice norms that resulted in safer surgery. These innovations in surgical safety had a profound impact on patient mortality and would transform the manner in which surgery, and medicine, would hence be approached. In 1867, for example, Joseph Lister introduced the use of a preoperative antibacterial preparation, at a time when surgical site and deep soft-tissue infections were common and often the cause of postoperative patient morbidity and mortality.1 In the United States, William Stewart Halsted insisted on universal operative hand scrubbing as a patient safety maneuver to decrease postoperative infections.2 These innovations were simple and are common sense by today’s standards, yet they effectively transformed the practice of surgery; they made it safer and allowed for the complexity of procedures to increase. The public’s perception of the surgeon changed as well, evolving from the experimental anatomist and radical thinker exemplified by John Hunter in the 18th century to the effective healer and possessor of special skill of modern times.3

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();