We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Improved Perioperative Outcomes With Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy:  Results From a Population-Based Analysis

Hop S. Tran Cao, MD1,2; Nicole Lopez, MD2; David C. Chang, PhD2; Andrew M. Lowy, MD2; Michael Bouvet, MD2; Joel M. Baumgartner, MD2; Mark A. Talamini, MD2,3; Jason K. Sicklick, MD2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
2Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System, University of California, San Diego
3now with Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):237-243. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3202.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Interest in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has grown in recent years, but currently available data are limited. Greater insight into application patterns and outcomes may be gained from a national database inquiry.

Objectives  To study trends in the use of MIDP and compare the short-term outcomes of MIDP with those of open distal pancreatectomy.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Population-based retrospective cohort study evaluating perioperative outcomes and hospital charge measures for distal pancreatectomy, comparing the surgical approaches and adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, among patients undergoing elective distal pancreatectomy from 1998 to 2009 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a 20% stratified sample of all US hospitals.

Main Outcomes and Measures  In-hospital mortality, rates of perioperative complications and splenectomy, total charges, and length of stay.

Results  A total of 8957 distal pancreatectomies were included in this analysis, of which 382 (4.3%) were MIDPs. On a national level, this projected to 42 320 open distal pancreatectomies and 1908 MIDPs. The proportion of distal pancreatectomies performed via minimally invasive approaches tripled between 1998 and 2009, from 2.4% to 7.3%. The groups were comparable for sex and comorbidity profiles, while patients who underwent MIDP were 1.5 years older. On multivariate analysis, MIDP was associated with lower rates of overall predischarge complications, including lower incidences of postoperative infections and bleeding complications, as well as a shorter length of stay by 1.22 days. There were no differences in rates of in-hospital mortality, concomitant splenectomy, or total charges.

Conclusions and Relevance  This population-based study of MIDP reveals that the application of this approach has tripled in practice and provides strong evidence that MIDP has evolved into a safe option in the treatment of benign and malignant pancreatic diseases.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Trends in Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) Performance From 1998 to 2009 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

While the numbers of open DP (ODP) and minimally invasive DP (MIDP) increased through the years, the performance of MIDP as a percentage of all DPs tripled during this period, from 2.4% to 7.3% of all DPs.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles