We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

Current Choices in Robotic Surgery Whether to Increase Use

Ye-Ji Kwon, MD1; Sungsoo Park, MD, PhD2,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Neurology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul
2Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul
3Minimally Invasive Surgery and Robotic Surgery Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):627-628. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3999.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


On an unusually quiet afternoon, we turned on the television and found that all the channels were broadcasting soap opera reruns. We kept changing channels and finally picked one that was popular several years ago. One of the supporting characters was a famous actress—unfortunately, because of the way she died.

On May 16, 2011, a large number of the Korean population was upset over the news reporting the death the famous actress after her robotic nephrectomy. Many people felt betrayed because they expected amazing outcomes from robotic surgery. The first Korean robotic surgery was performed in 2005, and it immediately gained national attention because of the impressive advertising by the manufacturer and hospitals, who were seeking more patients. In the United States, where most robotic surgery has been practiced, it has been a topic of debate since the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc) in 2000 under a controversial process known as premarket notification.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles