We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Zenker Diverticulum—Invited Critique

Jack Pickleman, MD
Arch Surg. 1998;133(10):1133. doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1133.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This procedure does not get the respect it deserves, probably because on some days the operation can be remarkably easy. At other times, however, it can be distressingly difficult, and many a surgeon has been humbled by it. Several issues raised by the authors deserve comment. Whoever is performing the preoperative endoscopy should be advised of the diagnosis, as perforation can result from forceful entry into the diverticulum while mistaking it for the esophageal lumen. Except in unique circumstances, general anesthesia should be employed. The authors' recommendation for laryngoscopy at this point with suctioning and packing of the diverticulum seems to be an excellent one, as initial identification of the sac can occasionally be difficult. Although the authors hedge a bit regarding transection of the strap muscles, this step plus ligation of the middle and inferior thyroid vessels enhances exposure significantly. I must admit that I have never identified a recurrent laryngeal nerve solely by palpation—but whatever means are used, this is a critical step, as injury to this structure represents the most serious complication of the procedure. Another important step emphasized by the authors is the posterior placement and length of the myotomy. I am a bit puzzled by their insistence on a proximal myotomy, if indeed a "Zenker diverticulum is a pulsion diverticulum due to an outflow obstruction caused by a noncompliant fibrotic cricopharyngeal sphincter." I have never performed this step and, to my knowledge, none of my patients has suffered a recurrence. I agree with the authors that most diverticula should be treated by suspension to the prevertebral fascia rather than excision. Not only does this simplify the procedure, but also it eliminates the possibility of leakage from the esophageal suture line. In my opinion, drainage should only be employed if an excision has been carried out or if the mucosa has been entered and repaired during performance of the myotomy. Last, the authors' recommendations regarding postoperative care seem quite conservative. Not allowing a patient with a diverticulopexy liquids until postoperative day 2 and then insisting on the presence of a physician implies at least a 2-day hospitalization for these patients, many of whom could be safely discharged on the first postoperative day. This article represents an excellent description of the operative treatment of patients with a Zenker diverticulum from one of our country's premier esophageal groups, and it should be closely studied by every surgeon attempting this procedure.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles