0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):10. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.1.10.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

This month we bring you a series of articles designed to make you think about ongoing problems and techniques in our surgical armamentarium. The first of these considers whether to stent bilioenteric anastomoses after iatrogenic injury. Dr Miguel Angel Mercado and associates recommended using a stent when nonhealthy (scarred, ischemic) and small ducts (<4 mm) are found.

See Article

The second article deals with the value of an extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancers and prognostic indicators after such procedures. In a significant series (26 patients), Dr Takanori Yoshida and associates achieved a 37% 5-year survival rate (comparable to the best results in current literature) and noted that patients with up to 2 positive lymph nodes and negative resection margins had a more favorable prognosis.

See Article

The beautifully illustrated third article concerns the technique of modified radical mastectomy. Drs Valerie L. Staradub and Monica Morrow explain in wonderful detail how they develop flaps, remove the pectoralis major fascia, and clear the axilla with a cold knife rather than the electrocautery.

See Article

Finally, Dr Charles P. Morrison and his colleagues review the problems of islet yield in pancreatic islet autotransplantation. They propose that reducing warm ischemia time may significantly increase the likelihood of postautotransplantation insulin independence.

See Article

QUALITY CARE IN SURGERY

The question of quality care has become a national issue in light of the expectations of an informed public and the advances in surgical physiology and techniques. Many definitions of quality and many sets of data regarding surgical outcomes are available, and it is our objective to present these to you, along with the thoughts of those who have devised them, so you may take an educated position in this modern health care debate. Therefore, we present 7 articles—by Drs Copeland (POSSUM system), Khuri (VA system), Grover (cardiothoracic system), Knaus (APACHE system), Carney (nutritional assessment), Ireson (outcome report card system), and Shuhaiber (commentary and proposal)—that will inform you of the current literature in this process. A commentary by Dr Gerald W. Peskin introduces this series of articles.

See Article

A 1-STAGE SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR POSTHERNIORRHAPHY NEUROPATHIC PAIN: TRIPLE NEURECTOMY AND PROXIMAL END IMPLANTATION WITHOUT MOBILIZATION OF THE CORD

Although fortunately few, patients with prolonged pain (neuralgia) and burning (paresthesia) in the inguinal and thigh areas after inguinal herniorrhaphy are potentially incapacitated and represent a therapeutic challenge. In an interesting article, Dr Parviz K. Amid of the Lichtenstein Hernia Institute, Los Angeles, Calif, proposes a new approach to this problem with very fine results. In a 1-stage procedure, he resects all 3 nerves and implants their proximal ends within muscle.

Dr Lloyd Nyhus, an expert at variations of hernia repair and their complications, presents an informed invited critique of Dr Amid's paper.

See Article

THE VALUE OF PARTIAL SPLENIC AUTOTRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH PORTAL HYPERTENSION: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

There has been much discussion regarding the immunological value of autotransplanted splenic fragments in trauma patients as well as those with splenic diseases. In this small series, Dr Hongwei Zhang and his associates identify a group of portal hypertensive patients with a degree of secondary hypersplenism who maintained splenic function after a Sugiura procedure and splenectomy with implantation of splenic fragments in the retroperitoneum. They used serum tuftsin and IgM as indicators of continuing immunologic function.

See Article

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 9

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.