Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma—Invited Critique

Richard J Bold, MD
Arch Surg. 2002;137(4):461. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.4.461.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The optimal surgical management of the regional nodal basin in cutaneous melanoma has long been an area of controversy. Four prospective trials have been conducted to determine whether ELND is superior to observation; unfortunately, no survival benefit has been observed. Lens et al report the results of a meta-analysis combining data from 3 of these trials. Using the end point of overall survival at 5 years, they observed a nonsignificant pooled odds ratio of 0.86 in favor of ELND. The authors assert that the trials are of questionable validity and call for an additional large-scale trial to resolve this issue. It is unlikely that another prospective randomized trial of ELND will be conducted given the development of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The goals of surgery directed at the regional nodal basin for cutaneous melanoma include identification of metastases and therapeutic removal of these metastases. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has surpassed ELND as a staging modality and has been widely accepted by surgeons throughout the world. Although Lens et al recognize the continued controversy regarding SLNB, the advantages in staging and subsequent risk stratification outweigh the potential risks, and SLNB has been adopted by most melanoma centers worldwide.1 Furthermore, it is recognized that some patients are indeed cured with ELND; however, these numbers may be small, and accurate identification of these patients remains difficult.2 Approximately 20% of patients will be found to harbor microscopic metastases at ELND; perhaps one quarter to one half of these will achieve a survival benefit from ELND. The majority of patients subjected to ELND will not benefit, further supporting SLNB in the management of cutaneous melanoma. While Lens et al attempt to end the controversy regarding ELND in cutaneous melanoma through the performance of a meta-analysis, the development of SLNB has essentially sealed the fate of ELND.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Melanoma