We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

Arch Surg. 2002;137(4):389. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.4.389.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Is there an answer to the question of the value of sentinel node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma? Lens et al have analyzed several series and endeavored to treat fairly both those treated by local excision and node dissection and those with local treatment alone. In the series they present, there is no obvious advantage for those receiving node dissection as an additional procedure. Although the authors assert that the trials they reviewed are of questionable validity and call for a large-scale additional trial to resolve the issue, the technique of sentinel node biopsy has been widely accepted as a staging modality, which probably precludes additional studies of this nature. Thus, until we can examine the melanoma primary and thereby make valid decisions regarding the need for node dissection, sentinel node biopsy rules the day.

Several articles deal with the value of a lavage cytologic technique in predicting the value of operative intervention for malignant disease, whether primary or metastatic. This is far from an exact science, but there does appear to be a correlation between the extent of disease and the positivity of the lavage cytologic technique. As is stated by Konishi et al, chemoradiation may make up for the variations in disease presence.

To establish a diagnosis in every situation, we have resorted to interventional radiologic examination for angiographic help. The problems associated with vascular puncture, primarily pseudoaneurysm, have been successfully handled with the use of small amounts of locally injected thrombin under ultrasound guidance. Although not a new technique, it deserves repeated emphasis for its simplicity and high success rate.


Much has been written about the wonderful immediate results with laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This article and discussion review the significant difficulties noted in longer-term follow-up of these patients, including heartburn treated with medication, hoarseness and coughing, dysphagia and bloating, and changes in diet or lifestyle. All in all, 19% of interviewees were bothered by the results of their operation.

See Article


Preoperative selection is the key to appropriate therapy for rectal cancer. The authors point out the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-arrayed coils as an alternative after ultrasound failure for bulky lesions, strictures, low tumors, and locally advanced disease. Using this technique, it was possible to achieve excellent sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy in a series of consecutive patients. Even for malignant lymphadenopathy, 70% accuracy was obtained. With the advent of newer contrast media specifically for the lymphatic system, or in combination with positron emission tomographic scanning, we may possess the ideal staging tools.

See Article


Innumerable articles have dealt with the causes of inflammatory bowel disease. This article provides elegant data in an attempt to support the role of interleukin 1β as a mediator of motor dysfunction of the colonic circular muscle in patients with ulcerative colitis. Other cytokines are to be part of the investigation.

See Article




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.