0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

Arch Surg. 2002;137(5):514. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.5.514.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In the presidential address delivered to the Western Surgical Association, Dr Richardson reiterates many of the points made in a symposium in the March issue of the ARCHIVES entitled "The Generation Gap." He presents the fact that surgery is losing applicants for residency training and relates this to 3 elements of professional satisfaction: loss of prestige, loss of economic incentives, and lifestyle issues. His solutions include an in-depth study of workforce needs in surgery, support for the American College of Surgeons' efforts to inform those making decisions on physician reimbursement of the current inequities, more emphasis on advocating surgical experience early in medical school and meaningful representation on the curriculum committee, and, perhaps most important, modifying many aspects of the surgical residency program, including work hours, more education and less service, better use of ancillary personnel, and attention to the requirements of women with regard to family planning.

The articles about sentinel node removal and analysis continue for both malignant melanoma and breast cancer. Many questions are raised regarding the proper indications for this technique, its value in this era of extensive use of adjuvant chemotherapy, the processing of the removed node or nodes, the morbidity of interval sentinel node dissection in melanoma, the value of performing bone marrow biopsies, the true role of "upstaging" related to sentinel node positivity, and the value of frozen section analysis of sentinel nodes. Sentinel node biopsy is now widely practiced and accepted. Is the new technology of immunocytochemical staining superseding our knowledge of how to deal with micrometastases? What are the characteristics that allow us to predict positivity of nodes? Will the sentinel node concept be time limited?

Emphasizing technique, the following articles are noted:

PANCREAS-SPARING DUODENECTOMY FOR DUODENAL POLYPOSIS

Sarmiento et al at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, present 8 patients treated for their presumed benign duodenal polyps by a pancreas-sparing duodenectomy. Although the morbidity of the procedure is significant (same range as a Whipple procedure), the mortality is low, and the patient is left with a good absorptive capacity, weight gain, and an excellent quality of life. The procedure is a demanding one, involving reanastomosis of the biliary and pancreatic ductal systems to the neoduodenum and the individual ligation of all feeding vessels. To date, the Mayo group has been able to separate benign from malignant lesions by preoperative testing. Will this procedure supplant the Whipple procedure for duodenal lesions? What does one do if malignancy is noted on frozen or permanent sectioning of the lesion? These questions remain to be answered.

LEARNING LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY SAFELY: A REPORT ON 100 CASES

The need for donor kidneys greatly outweighs the supply. By combining the skills of laparoscopy with those of open donor nephrectomy (2 individuals), the problems of the learning curve are minimized. In this series from Seattle, Wash, only 1 of 100 laparoscopic attempts at live donor nephrectomy required conversion to an open technique, minimal complications developed (similar to the open technique), and fewer ureteral problems were encountered. The graft function was comparable to the open technique. This demonstration should stimulate continued use of living donor renal grafts countrywide.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.