We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

Arch Surg. 2002;137(8):881. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.8.881.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Several controversies regarding surgical treatment of disease are discussed in this issue. The first concerns the approach to patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. There appears to be a good deal of pressure to perform preoperative localization with sestamibi scanning, focused unilateral minimally invasive operations, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone analysis. Lee and NortonArticle present a literature review of 2095 patients operated on with a focused unilateral approach that yielded 92.5% of patients with a single adenoma and 5.3% with multiple adenomas, whereas of 2166 patients who underwent bilateral neck exploration, 19.3% had multiple-gland disease. In their own series of bilateral open-neck exploration, 20.6% of patients had multiple-gland disease. The best explanation of this discrepancy appears to be selection, with an alternative being the function of the second- and third-gland disease. As part of this discussion, please review the cost-benefit analysis by Fahy et alArticle, indicating that limited parathyroid surgery using any localizing strategy is cost-effective, safe, and efficacious in the management of primary hyperparathyroid disease.

The other point of contention is the potential gain from systematic postoperative evaluation for second primary lung cancer in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Lamont et al contend that in experienced hands, regular computed tomographic scanning detects second primary lesions earlier, distinguishes them from benign areas, and allows longer survival as a result of early resection. The author of our Invited Critique, an experienced thoracic surgeon, points out that current evidence is insufficient to justify the expenditure, but encourages the authors to continue their objective assessment in the current climate of "evidence-based" medical practice.

See Article


In a study of 118 trauma patients who underwent splenectomy, 60 developed postoperative sepsis, and 58 did not. Toutouzas et al identified 3 independent predictors of sepsis by stepwise regression analysis: (1) day 5 platelet–white blood cell count ratio below 20, (2) Injury Severity Score of 17 or above, and (3) day 5 white blood cell count above 15 × 103/µL. The probability of sepsis when all 3 predictors were present was 97.4%. Thus, the authors concluded that a white blood cell count above 15 × 103/µL and a platelet–white blood cell count ratio below 20 are strongly associated with sepsis and should not be considered part of the physiologic response to splenectomy.

See Article


To establish that contemporary reconstructive vascular procedures can be safely used to permit resection of tumors invading major vascular structures, a multidisciplinary group of authors studied 49 patients who required vascular resection and reconstruction to allow complete tumor resection. Despite the horrendous nature of the primary tumors, they achieved a 30-day mortality of only 2.1% and morbidity of 12.2%. No patient died or lost a limb because of occlusion of the vascular reconstruction. Overall, 31 patients (63%) were alive, without tumor recurrence, and with a patent vascular reconstruction at 24 months. We are making strides.

See Article


These technically skilled authors performed 20 laparoscopic adrenalectomies for various primary and metastatic adrenal malignancies with excellent margin control and minimal conversion. They had unreliable results with fine-needle aspiration preoperatively and a high recurrence rate with adrenal cortical cancer, but they suggest this technique for suspected adrenal metastases.

See Article




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.