0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas—Reply

Conrad Claudius, MD, PhD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):104. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.234.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We thank Naguib and colleagues for their interest in our publication and the thorough analysis of our article and would like to respond to several comments. First, while plain radiography is clearly less sensitive than CT, one of our key observations is the correlation between the increased sensitivity of CT and the decreased mortality associated with HPVG. Indeed, we conclude that it is the sensitivity of CT that has resulted in the discovery of iatrogenic HPVG as well as other low-mortality conditions. By this mechanism, the introduction of CT has essentially reduced the specificity of HPVG for life-threatening conditions, necessitating guidelines for the management of those findings. The data from the 1950s and 1960s are clear: plain radiography HPVG is definitively associated with high mortality rates because the low sensitivity will detect only profound anatomic abnormalities. Furthermore, we agree completely with the authors' opinion, that “for borderline cases, further reviewing or investigations, eg, diagnostic laparoscopy, may help in deciding the proper management,” circumstances in which we advise caution in our ABC algorithm (B = be careful).

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

January 1, 2010
Naguib Nader, MS, MD, MRCS; Gupta Vivek, MRCS; Mekhail Peter, MRCS; Izzidien Asal, FRCS; Masoud Ashraf, FRCS
Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):103-104. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.233.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();