0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Centers of Excellence—Reply

Livingston Edward H., MD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):107-108. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.257.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

Mr Pratt is critical of my use of statistical analysis and states that SRC statisticians as well as those at the University of North Carolina reviewed my analyses and found them to be flawed. Mr Pratt fails to name these statisticians and none of them coauthored his letter. His criticism centers on the fact that I found a statistically significant relationship between procedure volume and outcomes and concluded that volume was not a clinically important predictor of outcomes. I readily acknowledge that there was a statistically significant P value relating procedure volume to complication rates. Nonetheless, P values alone do not tell the entire story. Accepting a P value as the exclusive evidence for acceptance of scientific data is akin to deciding a patient is dead because his or her eyes are closed. Closed eyes are associated with death but other factors must be considered before drawing the conclusion. The reason that a statistically significant volume-outcome relationship can be of little practical importance was summarized in detail in prior publications on the topic.1,2

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

January 1, 2010
Latts Lisa, MD, MSPH, MBA; Singer Joseph, MD
Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):106-107. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.256.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();