0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Decision Modeling to Estimate the Impact of Gastric Bypass Surgery on Life Expectancy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity FREE

Daniel P. Schauer, MD, MSc; David E. Arterburn, MD, MPH; Edward H. Livingston, MD; David Fischer, MD; Mark H. Eckman, MD, MS
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Divisions of General Internal Medicine (Drs Schauer and Eckman) and General Surgery (Dr Fischer), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Group Health Center for Health Studies, Seattle, Washington (Dr Arterburn); and Department of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Southwestern School of Medicine, University of Texas, Dallas (Dr Livingston).


Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):57-62. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.240.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To create a decision analytic model to estimate the balance between treatment risks and benefits for patients with morbid obesity.

Design  Decision analytic Markov state transition model with multiple logistic regression models as inputs. Data from the 2005 National Inpatient Survey were used to calculate in-hospital mortality risk associated with bariatric surgery and then adjusted for 30-day mortality. To calculate excess mortality associated with obesity, we used the 1991-1996 National Health Interview Survey linked to the National Death Index. Bariatric surgery was assumed to influence mortality only through its impact on the excess mortality associated with obesity, and the efficacy of surgery was estimated from a recent large observational trial.

Intervention  Gastric bypass surgery.

Main Outcome Measure  Life expectancy.

Results  Our base case, a 42-year-old woman with a body mass index of 45, gained an additional 2.95 years of life expectancy with bariatric surgery. No surgical treatment was favored in our base case when the 30-day surgical mortality exceeded 9.5% (baseline 30-day mortality, 0.2%) or when the efficacy of bariatric surgery for reducing mortality decreased to 2% or less (baseline efficacy, 53%).

Conclusions  The optimal decision for individual patients varies based on the balance of risk between perioperative mortality, excess annual mortality risk associated with increasing body mass index, and the efficacy of surgery; however, for the average morbidly obese patient, gastric bypass improves life expectancy.

Figures in this Article

Morbid obesity continues to be a growing problem in the United States, affecting 5.1% of the population,1 with an associated increase in direct health care costs of more than $11 billion.2 Available evidence indicates that dietary, behavioral, and drug treatment options frequently fail to result in sustained, clinically meaningful weight loss in patients with morbid obesity.35 Given the increasing prevalence of morbid obesity and the lack of viable alternative treatments, the annual demand for bariatric surgery has increased dramatically during the past 12 years from 16 800 cases6 in 1992 to an estimated 205 000 cases7 in 2007.

While no large-scale randomized controlled trials have compared bariatric surgery with intensive medical management for the morbidly obese, there is evidence from large controlled clinical trials and numerous case series that bariatric surgery is currently the only effective therapy for promoting clinically significant weight loss and improving obesity-associated conditions among adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or higher (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).812 Bariatric surgery has also been shown to be cost-effective compared with nonoperative weight loss interventions.13

Several retrospective cohort studies and 1 prospective study suggest that bariatric surgery also improves survival.12,1416 In the largest study to date, Adams and colleagues14 matched 7925 subjects who had gastric bypass with 7925 controls identified through the Bureau of Motor Vehicles in Utah. After a mean follow-up of 7.1 years, adjusted mortality had decreased by 40% in the group who underwent surgery.

However, bariatric surgery is not without risk. The 30-day mortality rate following bariatric surgery has been reported to range from 0% to 2%,8,17 but the risk for select subgroups of patients may be much higher.1820 One retrospective cohort study in 16 155 people who underwent bariatric surgery found that the mortality rate at 1 year was 4.6% and that mortality rates were greater for those aged 65 years or older compared with younger people at 1 year.18 In a case series of 1067 patients, patients older than 55 years of age had a 3-fold increase in mortality.20

While bariatric surgery has been proven to be efficacious and cost-effective in reducing obesity and obesity-associated conditions, clinical trials have not clearly identified characteristics of the ideal surgical candidate. One must consider tradeoffs between early surgical risk and long-term efficacy. Clearly, when surgical risk is low and life expectancy following surgery is long, the decision to have bariatric surgery may be straightforward. However, when the surgical risk is higher and the patient has less time to realize the benefits of weight loss, the decision to have bariatric surgery is more difficult. Morbidly obese patients considering bariatric surgery would benefit from a better understanding of the uncertainties associated with the procedure and its impact on weight loss. Therefore, our goal was to better characterize obesity-related mortality and the risks of bariatric surgery and then create a decision analytic model to estimate the balance between treatment risks and benefits for patients with morbid obesity across a variety of clinical scenarios.

We developed a decision analytic Markov state transition model to evaluate 2 clinical strategies in morbidly obese patients: bariatric surgery vs no surgical treatment. We chose to model only gastric bypass, because it is the most common procedure for morbid obesity in the United States, accounting for more than 65% of cases.19 The decision model was constructed using Decision Maker,21 and all other analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina).

For our base case analyses, we chose a 42-year-old woman with a BMI of 45 and a 44-year-old man with a BMI of 45, since they could be considered average morbidly obese surgical patients. We also performed analyses for a series of BMI, age, and sex categories.

DECISION MODEL STRUCTURE

The model incorporates a 30-day cycle length and a life-long time horizon. Prior to entering the Markov simulation, patients in the bariatric surgery branch face the 30-day risk of surgery-related mortality. During the first month of the simulation, all patients enter either a postoperative state or a nonsurgical morbidly obese state. During each monthly cycle, patients face a mortality risk that is based on their BMI, surgical status, age, and sex. Outcomes are evaluated using non–quality-adjusted life-years, because long-term data on changes in quality of life are not currently available for these populations.

ASSUMPTIONS

Major simplifying assumptions included assuming that bariatric surgery influences mortality only through its impact on the excess mortality associated with obesity and for the subjects not receiving surgery, that BMI category did not change over time. We explored these assumptions through sensitivity analyses.

MODEL INPUTS
Mortality Due to Obesity

Age-, sex-, and BMI-specific risk of death was calculated using the publicly available National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) linked to the National Death Index. The NHIS is a nationally representative yearly survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics to gauge the health of the civilian, uninstitutionalized US population. Mortality follow-up was performed through December 31, 2002, and is based on a probabilistic match with each NHIS participant.

We combined the data sets from 1991 through 1996, and the resulting data set was then weighted to be a nationally representative sample. We used this data set to develop a multivariable logistic regression model that predicts 5-year mortality based on age, sex, and BMI. Because we were most interested in fitting the model to the subset of the population that was overweight or obese, we limited the analysis to subjects with a BMI greater than 25.

The logistic regression model was used to estimate the excess mortality associated with obesity. We calculated the annual death rate for specific examples and compared them with the average weight-, age-, and sex-matched death rate to derive the excess annual mortality associated with BMI. We used a BMI of 26 as the referent, as this was the average BMI in the NHIS data set between 1991 and 1996. In the decision model, we added the excess mortality rate associated with obesity to the calculated mortality rates for an average weight population based on age and sex.

Bariatric Surgery Risk

A second logistic regression model was developed to calculate the in-hospital mortality risk associated with bariatric surgery using data from the 2005 National Inpatient Survey. The National Inpatient Survey is an administrative data set and does not contain height or weight information, so we included only age and sex as variables in the final model. Because in-hospital mortality has been shown15 to underestimate 30-day mortality by a factor of 2 to 3, we adjusted upwards the probability of death calculated using the logistic regression model by a factor of 3.0. This is a conservative estimate that biases the model against gastric bypass surgery. We explored this factor in sensitivity analyses.

Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery

To determine the impact of surgery on survival, we used a retrospective cohort study of gastric bypass with matched controls published by Adams et al.14 We calculated the efficacy of surgery from this 7-year study correcting for age and sex by calculating the average survival rate for the surgical and nonsurgical arms of the study. We then subtracted the expected survival for an age- and sex-matched cohort using life tables. Comparing the resultant differences between the surgical group and nonsurgical group yields the effect of surgery on the mortality associated with obesity.

In the model, the mortality risk reduction resulting from surgery was multiplied by the excess mortality rate associated with obesity. In this way, surgery could only impact mortality associated with obesity and not improve survival beyond that of the normal-weight population.

More than 399 000 subjects from the NHIS data set were included in the final calculation of excess mortality from obesity. The average age was 44.6 years, and 46% of the sample was male. The median BMI was 26. The final multivariable logistic regression model predicting mortality based on age, sex, and BMI incorporated 7 terms: BMI, BMI2, age, age2, sex, sex × BMI, and age × sex. The fit to the data was good (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, P > .05; c statistic, 0.83). Model estimates of annual death rates, stratified by sex, are presented in Figure 1.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Annual predicted death rate by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Graphic Jump Location

We included 23 281 subjects from the National Inpatient Survey data set to calculate in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Overall, 0.13% of patients died during their hospitalization in 2005. The results of the logistic regression model predicting in-hospital mortality are presented in Figure 2, adjusted for 30-day mortality. Male patients and older patients had higher 30-day mortality from bariatric surgery.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Thirty-day predicted probability of death after bariatric surgery for men and women by age.

Graphic Jump Location
MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION

To evaluate the model calibration, we compared predicted outcomes from our model with the control group described in the study by Adams et al.14 Because the control arm of their study is only used in the calculation of the efficacy term for the decision model and is not used in the nonsurgical arm of the decision model, using the results of the decision model in the nonsurgical arm provides an unbiased comparison. The control group in this study consisted of 7925 subjects with an average age of 39 years, 84% of whom were female. During an average follow-up of 7.1 years, 4.1% of the control group died. Using these input parameters, our model predicted that 4.16% would die at 7.1 years without gastric bypass surgery.

MARKOV MODEL RESULTS

In our base case analysis for an average 42-year-old woman with a BMI of 45, bariatric surgery resulted in a gain of 2.95 years of life expectancy (35.03 vs 32.08 years). No surgical treatment was the preferred strategy in our base case when 30-day surgical mortality exceeded 9.5% (baseline 30-day mortality, 0.2%) or when the efficacy of bariatric surgery decreased to 2% or less (baseline efficacy, 53%).

Additional sensitivity analyses revealed that younger women with higher BMIs gained the most life expectancy from bariatric surgery (Figure 3). For women with a BMI of 45, surgery results in a gain of at least 1 year of life expectancy until age 80 years. Women with a BMI of 40 gain at least 1 year of life expectancy until age 74 years, while women with a BMI of 35 gain less than 1 year after age 60 years.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Change in life expectancy with bariatric surgery for men and women at different ages and body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Graphic Jump Location

A 44-year-old man with a BMI of 45 would gain 2.57 additional years of life (26.82 vs 24.25 years). No surgical treatment was preferred when the 30-day surgical mortality exceeded 8.6% (baseline 30-day mortality, 0.55%) or when the efficacy of bariatric surgery decreased to 3% or less (baseline efficacy, 53%).

As with women, younger men with higher BMIs gained the most life expectancy after bariatric surgery; however, the gain was slightly less for men of all ages and BMI subgroups (Figure 3). Men with a BMI of 45 gain at least 1 year of life expectancy until age 72 years. Men with a BMI of 40 gain at least 1 year of life expectancy until age 66 years, while men with a BMI of 35 gain less than 1 year after age 50 years.

Because variability in surgical mortality may be due to both institutional (eg, surgical centers) and individual patient characteristics, we examined this parameter closely. As expected, when the 30-day risk of dying from surgery is higher than average, the expected benefit of bariatric surgery is lower. However, the model is only sensitive to this parameter when the treatment decision is a close call (Figure 4).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Two-way sensitivity analysis for 30-day probability of death after surgery for women at age 42 years and men at age 44 years. In the region to the lower right, below the line, where the probability of death is low and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) is higher, bariatric surgery is preferred. To the upper left, when the probability of death is higher and the body mass index is lower, no surgery is the preferred strategy. The line indicates the threshold between the surgery and no surgery strategies.

Graphic Jump Location

There may be additional obesity-related comorbid conditions (eg, diabetes and hypertension) that impact survival; therefore, in any BMI category, some patients may have a higher or lower annual mortality risk. In sensitivity analyses examining this parameter, bariatric surgery becomes more attractive as the mortality of obesity-associated conditions increases. This is particularly evident in subgroups in which the benefit is small (eg, older age and lower BMI).

The efficacy of surgery may also vary across patient groups.14 Therefore, we examined the impact of changes in surgical efficacy across subgroups, including BMI and sex. Outcomes for men and older patients were more sensitive to this parameter (Figure 5).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Three-way sensitivity analysis for the impact of surgery on the relative risk of death (1-efficacy) at varying ages and body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, by sex. The areas below the lines are where surgery is the preferred strategy. For higher relative risks of death (or lower efficacies), above the lines, no surgery is preferred. For example, for a 45-year-old woman with a BMI of 40, when the relative risk of death after surgery is greater than 0.98 (efficacy of surgery is less than 0.02), no surgical treatment is the preferred strategy. When the relative risk of death after surgery is less than 0.98 (efficacy of surgery is greater than 0.02), bariatric surgery is the strategy with the greatest gain in life expectancy.

Graphic Jump Location

Some studies22 have suggested that bariatric surgery may be beneficial for patients with a BMI between 30 and 35. Therefore, we performed exploratory analyses for patients with a BMI in this range (Figure 6). In these subanalyses, women benefit from bariatric surgery. However, the benefit from surgery is very sensitive to the model parameters. For instance, a 42-year-old women with a BMI of 32 gains 0.8 years of life expectancy, but if the 30-day surgical mortality exceeds 2.4% (baseline 30-day mortality, 0.2%), surgery is no longer favored. Recognizing that the efficacy of surgery may be lower in this subgroup, we performed a sensitivity analysis on efficacy within this BMI range. We found that, as efficacy decreases, the benefit of surgery decreases for all ages, though, for a 42-year-old woman with a BMI of 32, surgery remains favored until the efficacy is below 4%. We found similar results for men, but the benefits of bariatric surgery were less.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Sensitivity analysis exploring effect of bariatric surgery on patients with lower body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, between 30 and 35.

Graphic Jump Location

We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the decision to have gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity. The optimal decision for individual patients varies depending on the balance of risks between perioperative mortality, excess annual mortality associated with increasing BMI, and the efficacy of surgery; however, for the average morbidly obese patient, gastric bypass surgery increases life expectancy. Younger patients have lower surgical risk and more time over which to realize the benefits of surgery. For older patients, the gain is smaller, and for some, gastric bypass surgery will decrease life expectancy.

The results of our base case are similar to the results of a previously published decision analysis by Pope and colleagues.21 Their analysis found that a 40-year-old woman with a BMI of 40 would gain 2.6 years of life expectancy with bariatric surgery and that the absolute life expectancy benefit is similar across age groups. However, we found that the absolute gain in life expectancy is inversely correlated with age.

There are 3 major differences between the 2 models that lead to somewhat different conclusions. First, the model by Pope and colleagues assumed that the increase in life expectancy was due to changes in BMI after surgery, placing the patient in a new BMI category with a lower mortality rate; while in our model, we made no assumptions about weight loss, rather, we used an efficacy term derived from a large prospective cohort study. Second, Pope and colleagues estimated the additional mortality associated with obesity by using a large prospective cancer trial and were unable to adjust for the effect of age on mortality. By using NHIS, we were able to use a nationally representative sample fully adjusted for age, sex, and BMI across a broader continuum. Finally, the surgical morality risk used by Pope and colleagues was based on case series and explored in sensitivity analyses. The surgical risk in our model is based on a logistic regression model derived from the National Inpatient Survey that takes into account patient age and sex. These 3 factors allow our model to better examine a wide range of patient-specific scenarios and BMI categories.

There are several limitations to our analysis. Because the data set from the National Inpatient Survey is derived from administrative data, it does not include clinical variables, such as BMI, that may be important predictors of surgical mortality. However, the National Inpatient Survey data set provides the best nationally representative sample of surgical mortality, and until more complete data sets become available, the most generalizable estimates of surgical mortality. A number of obesity-associated conditions may increase operative mortality and conversely may increase the benefits following successful surgery. However, data capturing this level of detail do not currently exist. When such data become available, models like ours will be able to make even more specific recommendations.

The data used to determine the efficacy of surgery, from the study by Adams et al,14 is from a single state, Utah, and is not from a randomized controlled trial. While these data are not nationally representative and involve selection bias, it is the largest study to date demonstrating the efficacy of gastric bypass surgery.

Another limitation of our analysis is that we did not model long-term complications following surgery, including the need for surgical revision. However, by using efficacy data published by Adams and colleagues, we indirectly accounted for long-term mortality due to surgery. The most common complications, anastomotic stricture, marginal ulcer, and internal hernia, are rarely fatal and therefore have limited impact on life expectancy.

Because data describing longitudinal changes in quality of life over time owing to changes in body weight are not yet available, we chose to use life expectancy alone as our outcome metric. Gastric bypass surgery has been shown to improve quality of life in the short-term.23 Until there are studies demonstrating the durability and stability of the quality of life improvements using preference-based utilities suitable for use in a decision analysis, incorporating quality of life adjustments would bias the results of the model toward favoring gastric bypass.

We did not explicitly model deaths due to accident or suicide, though it has been reported that patients having bariatric surgery may be at increased risk of these events.14 However, we included these deaths in the determination of the efficacy and thus biased the model further against bariatric surgery by systematically underestimating the effect of surgery on obesity-related mortality.

It is likely that certain subgroups of patients with high mortality due to obesity-associated conditions but with a BMI of less than 35 may benefit from gastric bypass. Our sensitivity analyses demonstrated that, for women in particular, there are subgroups of patients with a BMI between 30 and 35 whose survival would improve with surgery. Further research needs to explore the benefit of bariatric surgery in subgroups of patients who may benefit outside of the current guidelines.

The decision analysis presented here is a step forward in understanding optimal patient selection but also highlights some of the areas for which better data are needed. Understanding more about how efficacy of bariatric surgery varies based on patient characteristics is an important next step because the data necessary to accurately model these outcomes are not currently available. For example, there are currently data on the impact of bariatric surgery on the resolution of diabetes,24 but there are no data on the stability of this resolution over time or how this affects long-term mortality. Likewise, it would not be accurate to stratify operative mortality by obesity-associated condition in the decision analysis without including long-term mortality projections. Including presurgical duration of obesity-associated conditions may also be important, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus. The presence of microvascular or macrovascular complications prior to surgery may impact both surgical risk and the efficacy of surgery.

In conclusion, while not all patients are guaranteed a good outcome, our model indicates that gastric bypass increases life expectancy for most patient subgroups; however, for those at high surgical risk or in whom efficacy of surgery is likely to be low, benefit will be minimal. We believe results of this analysis can be used to better inform both patients' and physicians' decisions regarding gastric bypass surgery.

Correspondence: Daniel P. Schauer, MD, MSc, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, PO Box 670535, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0535 (daniel.schauer@uc.edu).

Accepted for Publication: February 25, 2009.

Author Contributions: Dr Schauer had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Schauer, Arterburn, Livingston, Fischer, and Eckman. Acquisition of data: Schauer and Livingston. Analysis and interpretation of data: Schauer, Arterburn, Livingston, Fischer, and Eckman. Drafting of the manuscript: Schauer and Livingston. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Arterburn, Livingston, Fischer, and Eckman. Statistical analysis: Schauer, Livingston, and Eckman. Obtained funding: Schauer and Arterburn. Study supervision: Eckman.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant 1K23DK075599-01A1 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Dr Schauer).

Role of the Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Hedley  AAOgden  CLJohnson  CLCarroll  MDCurtin  LRFlegal  KM Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA 2004;291 (23) 2847- 2850
PubMed Link to Article
Arterburn  DEMaciejewski  MLTsevat  J Impact of morbid obesity on medical expenditures in adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29 (3) 334- 339
PubMed Link to Article
Arterburn  D Obesity. Am Fam Physician 2002;66 (7) 1279- 1280
PubMed
Arterburn  DECrane  PKVeenstra  DL The efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2004;164 (9) 994- 1003
PubMed Link to Article
Li  ZMaglione  MTu  W Meta-analysis: pharmacologic treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005;142 (7) 532- 546
PubMed Link to Article
Steinbrook  R Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med 2004;350 (11) 1075- 1079
PubMed Link to Article
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Fact sheet: metabolic & bariatric surgery. http://www.asmbs.org/Newsite07/media/asmbs_fs_surgery.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2008
Maggard  MAShugarman  LRSuttorp  M Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005;142 (7) 547- 559
PubMed Link to Article
McTigue  KMHarris  RHemphill  B Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003;139 (11) 933- 949
PubMed Link to Article
Sjöström  LLindroos  AKPeltonen  MSwedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group, Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;351 (26) 2683- 2693
PubMed Link to Article
Ma  YPagoto  SLOlendzki  BC Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2006;16 (9) 1227- 1231
PubMed Link to Article
Sjöström  LNarbro  KSjöström  CDSwedish Obese Subjects Study, Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (8) 741- 752
PubMed Link to Article
Salem  LDevlin  ASullivan  SDFlum  DR Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and nonoperative weight loss interventions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008;4 (1) 26- 32
PubMed Link to Article
Adams  TDGress  RESmith  SC Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (8) 753- 761
PubMed Link to Article
Flum  DRDellinger  EP Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199 (4) 543- 551
PubMed Link to Article
Christou  NVSampalis  JSLiberman  M Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004;240 (3) 416- 424
PubMed Link to Article
Morino  MToppino  MForestieri  PAngrisani  LAllaix  MEScopinaro  N Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg 2007;246 (6) 1002- 1009
PubMed Link to Article
Flum  DRSalem  LElrod  JADellinger  EPCheadle  AChan  L Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005;294 (15) 1903- 1908
PubMed Link to Article
Livingston  EH Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 2004;188 (2) 105- 110
PubMed Link to Article
Livingston  EHHuerta  SArthur  DLee  SDe Shields  SHeber  D Male gender is a predictor of morbidity and age a predictor of mortality for patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg 2002;236 (5) 576- 582
PubMed Link to Article
Pope  GDFinlayson  SRKemp  JABirkmeyer  JD Life expectancy benefits of gastric bypass surgery. Surg Innov 2006;13 (4) 265- 273
PubMed Link to Article
O'Brien  PEDixon  JBLaurie  C Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006;144 (9) 625- 633
PubMed Link to Article
Puzziferri  NAustrheim-Smith  ITWolfe  BMWilson  SENguyen  NT Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2006;243 (2) 181- 188
PubMed Link to Article
Buchwald  HAvidor  YBraunwald  E Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292 (14) 1724- 1737
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Annual predicted death rate by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Thirty-day predicted probability of death after bariatric surgery for men and women by age.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Change in life expectancy with bariatric surgery for men and women at different ages and body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Two-way sensitivity analysis for 30-day probability of death after surgery for women at age 42 years and men at age 44 years. In the region to the lower right, below the line, where the probability of death is low and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) is higher, bariatric surgery is preferred. To the upper left, when the probability of death is higher and the body mass index is lower, no surgery is the preferred strategy. The line indicates the threshold between the surgery and no surgery strategies.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Three-way sensitivity analysis for the impact of surgery on the relative risk of death (1-efficacy) at varying ages and body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, by sex. The areas below the lines are where surgery is the preferred strategy. For higher relative risks of death (or lower efficacies), above the lines, no surgery is preferred. For example, for a 45-year-old woman with a BMI of 40, when the relative risk of death after surgery is greater than 0.98 (efficacy of surgery is less than 0.02), no surgical treatment is the preferred strategy. When the relative risk of death after surgery is less than 0.98 (efficacy of surgery is greater than 0.02), bariatric surgery is the strategy with the greatest gain in life expectancy.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

Sensitivity analysis exploring effect of bariatric surgery on patients with lower body mass indexes (BMIs), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, between 30 and 35.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Hedley  AAOgden  CLJohnson  CLCarroll  MDCurtin  LRFlegal  KM Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA 2004;291 (23) 2847- 2850
PubMed Link to Article
Arterburn  DEMaciejewski  MLTsevat  J Impact of morbid obesity on medical expenditures in adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29 (3) 334- 339
PubMed Link to Article
Arterburn  D Obesity. Am Fam Physician 2002;66 (7) 1279- 1280
PubMed
Arterburn  DECrane  PKVeenstra  DL The efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2004;164 (9) 994- 1003
PubMed Link to Article
Li  ZMaglione  MTu  W Meta-analysis: pharmacologic treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005;142 (7) 532- 546
PubMed Link to Article
Steinbrook  R Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med 2004;350 (11) 1075- 1079
PubMed Link to Article
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Fact sheet: metabolic & bariatric surgery. http://www.asmbs.org/Newsite07/media/asmbs_fs_surgery.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2008
Maggard  MAShugarman  LRSuttorp  M Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005;142 (7) 547- 559
PubMed Link to Article
McTigue  KMHarris  RHemphill  B Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003;139 (11) 933- 949
PubMed Link to Article
Sjöström  LLindroos  AKPeltonen  MSwedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group, Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;351 (26) 2683- 2693
PubMed Link to Article
Ma  YPagoto  SLOlendzki  BC Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2006;16 (9) 1227- 1231
PubMed Link to Article
Sjöström  LNarbro  KSjöström  CDSwedish Obese Subjects Study, Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (8) 741- 752
PubMed Link to Article
Salem  LDevlin  ASullivan  SDFlum  DR Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and nonoperative weight loss interventions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008;4 (1) 26- 32
PubMed Link to Article
Adams  TDGress  RESmith  SC Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2007;357 (8) 753- 761
PubMed Link to Article
Flum  DRDellinger  EP Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199 (4) 543- 551
PubMed Link to Article
Christou  NVSampalis  JSLiberman  M Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 2004;240 (3) 416- 424
PubMed Link to Article
Morino  MToppino  MForestieri  PAngrisani  LAllaix  MEScopinaro  N Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg 2007;246 (6) 1002- 1009
PubMed Link to Article
Flum  DRSalem  LElrod  JADellinger  EPCheadle  AChan  L Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005;294 (15) 1903- 1908
PubMed Link to Article
Livingston  EH Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 2004;188 (2) 105- 110
PubMed Link to Article
Livingston  EHHuerta  SArthur  DLee  SDe Shields  SHeber  D Male gender is a predictor of morbidity and age a predictor of mortality for patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg 2002;236 (5) 576- 582
PubMed Link to Article
Pope  GDFinlayson  SRKemp  JABirkmeyer  JD Life expectancy benefits of gastric bypass surgery. Surg Innov 2006;13 (4) 265- 273
PubMed Link to Article
O'Brien  PEDixon  JBLaurie  C Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006;144 (9) 625- 633
PubMed Link to Article
Puzziferri  NAustrheim-Smith  ITWolfe  BMWilson  SENguyen  NT Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2006;243 (2) 181- 188
PubMed Link to Article
Buchwald  HAvidor  YBraunwald  E Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292 (14) 1724- 1737
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination EDUCATION GUIDES
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm