We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Standard of Care for Small Renal Masses in the 21st Century

Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD1; Chris M. Gonzalez, MD, MBA1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(7):672-673. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0440.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The cornerstone of treatment of small renal masses (SRMs), which are renal cancers of less than 4 cm, is surgical removal; metastatic renal cancer is largely incurable with limited response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Thus, most patients with SRMs elect surgery, either partial or radical nephrectomy by open or minimally invasive techniques. Guidelines from the American Urological Association1 published in 2009 urge partial nephrectomy for SRMs if technically feasible, with radical nephrectomy, ablation, or surveillance as alternatives based on tumor or patient preference. Since the description of partial nephrectomy, the techniques of vascular control (zero ischemia), urinary reconstruction, cold ischemia, and minimally invasive approaches have evolved with the goal of saving every possible nephron. Despite widespread use of partial nephrectomy at academic and tertiary referral centers,2 how far have we come as a field? In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Huang et al3 report on their analysis of national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry4 data in which they describe trends in management of SRMs from 2001 to 2009. The authors establish partial nephrectomy as the new standard of treatment for SRMs, with the frequency of nephron-sparing surgery eclipsing that of radical nephrectomy in 2009. Survival outcomes of partial nephrectomy appear to be at least equivalent and potentially superior in the short term (median, 63 months) compared with radical nephrectomy. Practically, the support for partial nephrectomy is bolstered both by patients hoping to preserve as much kidney as possible to prevent the burdens of hemodialysis and the urologist who has benefited from improvements in surgical experience and minimally invasive surgery. In 2015, most urologists first think, “How can I perform a partial nephrectomy for this mass?” with considerable disappointment when a radical nephrectomy is necessary owing to location of the mass or patient comorbidity.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles