0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Important Clarifications About Treating Indeterminate Vascular Injuries to the Neck

Jason T. Lee, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(9):847-848. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1731.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

The increasing reliance on and relative availability of high-quality cross-sectional imaging of vascular structures has altered the workup of patients with blunt trauma. Traditional 2-dimensional angiography and the extensive resources necessary to perform these procedures in critically injured patients have largely been replaced by rapid computed tomography angiography and 3-dimensional reconstructions; therefore, the early diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries in patients with blunt trauma have undergone a paradigm shift. Neck injury provides a particularly challenging subcohort of patients with trauma because it is often difficult to predict the progression of carotid and vertebral injuries and its effect on neurologic status. Crawford et al1 presented a timely and contemporary study of 100 patients with 138 blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs), focusing on the more challenging diagnostic dilemma of the indeterminate injury.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

205 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence to Support the Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence to Support the Update

brightcove.createExperiences();