0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Estimation of Life-Years Saved by Solid-Organ Transplant

Meredith C. Foster, ScD, MPH1; Narittaya Varothai, MD1; Daniel E. Weiner, MD, MS1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(10):1015. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1936.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

To the Editor Using data collected over 25 years from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, Rana and colleagues1 recently reported in JAMA Surgery that more than 2 million life-years were saved by solid-organ transplant. In their seminal article on the survival benefits of kidney transplant, Wolfe and colleagues2 previously reported that the likelihood of survival became equal for patients treated with dialysis who remained on the waiting list and for those who underwent a transplant at day 244, with survival after day 244 favoring transplant recipients; this reflects the higher risk of death more proximate to transplant surgery. Wolfe and colleagues,2 in their analyses, evaluated transplant status in patients on the transplant waiting list as a time-varying exposure to correctly classify exposed vs unexposed person-time when determining mortality risk. In contrast, when estimating life-years saved, Rana and colleagues1 used the time spent on the wait listing as a common point of origin. Accordingly, we are concerned that Rana and colleagues1 dramatically overestimate the number of life-years saved by solid-organ transplant owing to immortal person-time bias in transplant recipients.3 Because Rana and colleagues1 estimated the number of life-years saved as a result of transplant using the time of transplant listing, patients receiving a transplant are required to survive until they receive the transplant, making them “immortal” for the entire time they spend on the waiting list; this contrasts with waiting list–only patients, who, by definition, can die at any time following initial listing prior to transplant. Therefore, with this approach, the survival time accrued between the time of listing and the time of transplant for patients who received a transplant is misclassified as survival that is due to the transplant. As a result, the benefit of a transplant is overstated. While, given prior studies,2,4,5 we are confident that a transplant has advantages over dialysis for most patients, the results provided by Rana and colleagues1 are fatally biased and therefore should not be used in clinical practice to frame the potential benefits of solid-organ transplant.

Topics

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

October 1, 2015
Abbas Rana, MD; Angelika Gruessner, PhD; Rainer W. G. Gruessner, MD
1Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
2Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(10):1015-1016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1939.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

166 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();