We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

Raising the Bar for Failure to Rescue Critical Appraisal of Current Measurement and Strategies to Catalyze Improvement

Elliot Wakeam, MD, MPH1; Joseph A. Hyder, MD, PhD2,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
3Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(11):1023-1024. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1933.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This Viewpoint discusses failure to rescue as a surgical quality metric.

Failure to rescue (FTR), the death rate among patients with postoperative complications, is an emerging surgical quality metric that has received increased focus in the last several years.1 Medicare has begun publicly reporting FTR on Hospital Compare, and the National Quality Forum has endorsed 3 separate FTR measures.2 Despite this great promise and rapid adoption, considerably less attention has been paid to the way in which FTR is measured and what the measurement of FTR is intended to achieve. Despite the surge in interest within the surgical community in the last several years, current FTR measures have remained largely unchanged. In our view, the primary purpose of FTR measurement is to spur quality improvement, yet several issues remain with the way FTR is measured that limit its utility as a quality improvement tool. We summarize several key issues and suggest strategies to address these limitations.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles