We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism—Like Adult Clots, Only Smaller

Matthew J. Martin, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):57-58. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2680.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To say that we are “operating in the dark” when it comes to venous thromboembolism (VTE) screening and prophylaxis in children is an understatement. In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Connelly and colleagues1 have published a technically well-done statistical analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to develop a VTE risk prediction score for pediatric trauma patients. They ran a variety of permutations of clinical risk factors to develop the most accurate yet parsimonious risk prediction system from a training data set, and then they validated the accuracy using a validation data set. Their final best prediction model demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.932, generating a simple scoring system that predicted deep vein thrombosis risk ranging from 0% to 14%. To their credit, the authors avoided using in their risk prediction calculator standard injury characterization variables such as the Injury Severity Score or the Abbreviated Injury Score, which (although predictive of outcomes) are useless for guiding clinical decisions in the early hospital course of a pediatric trauma patient.2,3

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 3

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 3