0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Add Indication for Coronary Stent as a Risk Factor for Poor Outcome Following Noncardiac Surgery

Gilbert R. Upchurch Jr, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(5):469-470. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4662.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In this study by Holcomb and colleagues,1 the authors examined 26 661 patients over 10 years who had a coronary stent placed for 1 of 3 indications: (1) myocardial infarction (MI), (2) unstable angina, and (3) revascularization not associated with acute coronary syndrome. The authors then linked postoperative composite outcomes described as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) with clinical indication for coronary stenting in the 24 months following stent placement. The 3 groups were well matched in terms of size and demographics. The most important finding of this work is that postoperative MACE rates were significantly higher in the MI indication group (7.5%) compared with the other 2 groups. In fact, when surgery occurred within 3 months of coronary stent placement, the adjusted odds ratio of MACE was 5.25 (95% CI, 4.08-6.75) compared with the group with revascularization not associated with acute coronary syndrome. While the risk of MACE decreased over time, the rates remained higher out to 24 months for the MI group. In contrast to what is standard practice (ie, waiting an entire year to stop double antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] and intervene on a patient with a drug-eluting stent), the authors found in this cohort that stent type was not predictive of MACE. They concluded by suggesting that delaying elective noncardiac surgery to 6 months in the MI cohort of patients may be important regardless of stent type. In addition, while the impact is not as great, waiting a full 24 months for noncardiac surgery would still be beneficial (Figure 2 and the eFigure in the Supplement in the Holcomb et al article1) in terms of reducing MACE and MI alone.

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

266 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence To Support The Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference

brightcove.createExperiences();