0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Reconsidering the Resources Needed for Multiple Casualty Events Lessons Learned From the Crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214

Eric M. Campion, MD1; Catherine Juillard, MD, MPH1; M. Margaret Knudson, MD1; Rochelle Dicker, MD1; Mitchell J. Cohen, MD1; Robert Mackersie, MD1; Andre R. Campbell, MD1; Rachael A. Callcut, MD, MSPH1
[+] Author Affiliations
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(6):512-517. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5107.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  To date, a substantial portion of multiple casualty incident literature has focused exclusively on prehospital and emergency department resources needed for optimal disaster response. Thus, inpatient resources required to care for individuals injured in multiple casualty events are not well described.

Objective  To highlight the resources beyond initial emergency department triage needed for multiple casualty events, using one of the largest commercial aviation disasters in modern US history as a case study.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Prospective case series of injured individuals treated at an urban level I trauma center following the crash of Asiana Airlines flight 214 on July 6, 2013. This analysis was conducted between June 1, 2014, and December 1, 2015.

Exposure  Commercial jetliner crash.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Medical records, imaging data, nursing overtime, blood bank records, and trauma registry data were analyzed. Disaster logs, patient injuries, and blood product data were prospectively collected during the incident.

Results  Among 307 people aboard the flight, 192 were injured; 63 of the injured patients were initially evaluated at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (the highest number at any of the receiving medical facilities; age range, 4-74 years [23 were aged <17 years and 3 were aged >60 years]; median injury severity score of 19 admitted patients, 9 [range, 9-45]), including the highest number of critically injured patients (10 of 12). Despite the high impact of the crash, only 3 persons (<1%) died, including 1 in-hospital death. Among the 63 patients, 32 (50.8%) underwent a computed tomographic imaging study, with imaging of the abdomen and pelvis being the most common. Sixteen of the 32 patients undergoing computed tomography (50.0%) had a positive finding on at least 1 scan. Nineteen patients had major injuries and required admission, with 5 taken directly from the emergency department to the operating room. The most frequent injury was spinal fracture (13 patients). In the first 48 hours, 15 operations were performed and 117 total units of blood products were transfused. A total of 370 nursing overtime hours were required to treat the injured patients on the day of the event.

Conclusions and Relevance  Proper disaster preparedness requires attention to hospital-level needs beyond initial emergency department triage. The Asiana Airlines flight 214 crash highlights the need to plan for high use of advanced imaging, blood products, operating room availability, nursing resources, and management of inpatient hospital beds.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

472 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();