We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Commentary |

Complications, Costs, and Financial Incentives for Quality

Jonah J. Stulberg, MD, PhD, MPH1; Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):830. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0811.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


As we move away from a fee-for-service model of health care reimbursement toward value-based purchasing, payers are assuming these new models will drive down costs while simultaneously improving quality by shifting the financial burden of complications to providers. The complexities of our health care reimbursement systems and cost-accounting make determining whether this is true incredibly difficult. On the heels of a widely publicized article1 showing that in our current financial environment, complications may actually represent increased profits for hospitals, Healy and colleagues2 argue that financial incentives are already correctly aligned to decrease postoperative complications. They find that complications led to a decreased profit margin for hospitals from an average 5.8% in patients without complications to 0.1% for patients with complications. Furthermore, they found complications led to increased costs for third-party payers represented in increased reimbursements paid from $16 434 for patients without complications to $36 060 for patients with complications. They argue that this demonstrates our current financial models are already aligned to incentivize quality.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles