We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

The Effect of HLA-DR Matching on Pediatric Kidney Transplantation—Reply

Peter G. Stock, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):97-98. doi:10.1001/archsurg.147.1.97-b.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We concur with the comments by Grimaldi and Napoli that the degree of HLA-ABC mismatching will likely have an effect on rejection, sensitization, and graft survival in children. In our study,1 which was limited to a single center, we chose to focus on HLA-DR matching because the current US allocation system gives extra allocation points (in adults) for HLA-DR matching only. The national decision for awarding points for HLA-DR matching alone was based on data demonstrating a significant survival advantage for HLA-DR matching without disadvantaging minorities based on the relatively low frequencies of HLA-ABC matching.2 Indeed, as the data demonstrate in our study,1 the frequency of matching at the DR locus alone is so low that any attempts to match at HLA ABC as part of an allocation system would not be a realistic goal. Because DR matching has previously been shown to be most important in terms of graft survival without disadvantaging minorities, we focused on HLA-DR matching. The current US allocation system would require regional or even national sharing to match children for just HLA DR alone, and attempts at matching at both class I and class II major histocompatibility complex antigens would not be practical, even with broader sharing.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





January 1, 2012
Vincenzo Grimaldi, BiolD, MS; Claudio Napoli, MD, PhD
Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):97. doi:10.1001/archsurg.147.1.97-a.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections