We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Effectiveness of a Medical vs Revascularization Intervention for Intermittent Leg Claudication Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes ONLINE FIRST

Emily B. Devine, PhD, PharmD, MBA1,2,3,4,5; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho, MD, MSc, PhD1,2,5; N. David Yanez, PhD6,7; Todd C. Edwards, PhD3,5,8; Donald L Patrick, PhD, MSPH1,3,5,8; Cheryl A. L. Armstrong, RN, MPH2; Allison Devlin, MS2,5; Rebecca G. Symons, MPH2; Mark H. Meissner, MD9; Ellen L. T. Derrick, MD, MPH10; Danielle C. Lavallee, PhD, PharmD1,2,5; Larry G. Kessler, ScD1,3,5; David R. Flum, MD, MPH1,2,3,5 ; for the Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network (CERTAIN) Collaborative
[+] Author Affiliations
1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle
2Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle
3Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle
4Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle
5Centers for Comparative and Health Systems Effectiveness (CHASE) (CHASE Alliance), University of Washington, Seattle
6Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle
7School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
8Seattle Quality of Life Group, University of Washington, Seattle
9Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
10Providence Everett Medical Center, Everett, Washington
JAMA Surg. Published online August 17, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2024
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Intermittent claudication (IC) is the most common presentation of infrainguinal peripheral artery disease. Both medical and revascularization interventions for IC aim to increase walking comfort and distance, but there is inconclusive evidence of the comparative benefit of revascularization given the possible risk of limb loss.

Objective  To compare the effectiveness of a medical (walking program, smoking cessation counseling, and medications) vs revascularization (endovascular or surgical) intervention for IC in the community, focusing on outcomes of greatest importance to patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Longitudinal (12-month follow-up) prospective observational cohort study conducted between July 3, 2011, and November 5, 2014, at 15 clinics associated with 11 hospitals in Washington State. Participants were 21 years or older with newly diagnosed or established IC.

Interventions  Medical or revascularization interventions.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Primary end points were 12-month change scores on the distance, speed, and stair-climb domains of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (score range, 0-100). Secondary outcomes were change scores on the Walking Impairment Questionnaire pain domain (score range, 0-100), Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) (score range, 1-7), European Quality of Life–5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) (score range, 0-1), and Claudication Symptom Instrument (CSI) (score range, 0-4).

Results  A total of 323 adults were enrolled, with 282 (87.3%) in the medical cohort. At baseline, the mean duration of disease was longer for participants in the medical cohort, while those in the revascularization cohort reported more severe disease. Other characteristics were well balanced. At 12 months, change scores in the medical cohort reached significance for the following 3 outcomes: speed (5.9; 95% CI, 0.5-11.3; P = .03), VascuQol (0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.49; P = .008), and EQ-5D (0.038; 95% CI, 0.011-0.066; P = .006). In the revascularization cohort, there were significant improvements in the following 7 outcomes: distance (19.5; 95% CI, 7.9-31.0; P = .001), speed (12.1; 95% CI, 1.4-22.8; P = .03), stair climb (11.4; 95% CI, 1.3-21.5; P = .03), pain (20.7; 95% CI, 11.0-30.4; P < .001), VascuQol (1.10; 95% CI, 0.80-1.41; P < .001), EQ-5D (0.113; 95% CI, 0.067-0.159; P < .001), and CSI (−0.63; 95% CI, −0.96 to −0.31; P < .001). Relative improvements (percentage changes) at 12 months in the revascularization cohort over the medical cohort were observed as follows: distance (39.1%), speed (15.6%), stair climb (9.7%), pain (116.9%), VascuQol (41%), EQ-5D (18%), and CSI (13.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Among patients with IC, those in the revascularization cohort had significantly improved function (Walking Impairment Questionnaire), better health-related quality of life (VascuQol and EQ-5D), and fewer symptoms (CSI) at 12 months compared with those in the medical cohort, providing important information to inform treatment strategies in the community.

Figures in this Article


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Participant Flow Diagram

Shown are the numbers of patients from baseline to 6 months.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)

Shown are adjusted score estimates over time. Bars represent SEs.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Quality of Life and Symptom Assessment

Shown are adjusted score estimates over time. Bars represent SEs. CSI indicates Claudication Symptom Instrument; EQ-5D, European Quality of Life–5 Dimension Questionnaire; and VascuQoL, Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Peripheral Arterial Disease

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Make the Diagnosis: Peripheral Arterial Disease