0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Determining If Sex Bias Exists in Human Surgical Clinical Research ONLINE FIRST

Neel A. Mansukhani, MD1; Dustin Y. Yoon, MD, MS1; Katherine A. Teter, MD1; Vanessa C. Stubbs, MD1; Irene B. Helenowski, PhD1; Teresa K. Woodruff, PhD2,3; Melina R. Kibbe, MD1,3,4,5
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
3Women’s Health Research Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
4Editor, JAMA Surgery
5now with Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
JAMA Surg. Published online August 17, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2032
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Sex is a variable that is poorly controlled for in clinical research.

Objectives  To determine if sex bias exists in human surgical clinical research, to determine if data are reported and analyzed using sex as an independent variable, and to identify specialties in which the greatest and least sex biases exist.

Design, Setting, and Participants  For this bibliometric analysis, data were abstracted from 1303 original peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2012, in 5 surgery journals.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Study type, location, number and sex of participants, degree of sex matching of included participants, and inclusion of sex-based reporting, statistical analysis, and discussion of data.

Results  Of 2347 articles reviewed, 1668 (71.1%) included human participants. After excluding 365 articles, 1303 remained: 17 (1.3%) included males only, 41 (3.1%) included females only, 1020 (78.3%) included males and females, and 225 (17.3%) did not document the sex of the participants. Although female participants represent more than 50% (n = 57 688 606) of the total number (115 377 213) included, considerable variability existed with the number of male (46 111 818), female (58 805 665), and unspecified (10 459 730) participants included among the journals, between US domestic and international studies, and between single vs multicenter studies. For articles included in the study, 38.1% (497 of 1303) reported these data by sex, 33.2% (432 of 1303) analyzed these data by sex, and 22.9% (299 of 1303) included a discussion of sex-based results. Sex matching of the included participants in the research overall was poor, with 45.2% (589 of 1303) of the studies matching the inclusion of both sexes by 50%. During analysis of the different surgical specialties, a wide variation in sex-based inclusion, matching, and data reporting existed, with colorectal surgery having the best matching of male and female participants and cardiac surgery having the worst.

Conclusions and Relevance  Sex bias exists in human surgical clinical research. Few studies included men and women equally, less than one-third performed data analysis by sex, and there was wide variation in inclusion and matching of the sexes among the specialties and the journals reviewed. Because clinical research is the foundation for evidence-based medicine, it is imperative that this disparity be addressed so that therapies benefit both sexes.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Sex of Participants Included

Number and percentage of articles that state the sex of the human participants included in all articles (A) and percentage by journal (B). The distribution of rates of sex stated and not stated was different among journals (P < .001). C, Percentage of articles that include male-only participants, female-only participants, and male and female participants.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Sex-Based Data Reporting

Percentages are shown of articles that reported the data by sex, statistically analyzed the data by sex, and included a discussion of the results by sex.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Number of Male and Female Participants Included

The number and percentage of male, female, and unspecified participants included in all articles (A), percentage by journal (B), and percentage in US domestic and international studies (C). Distribution of included males, females, and unspecified participants among journals and between domestic and international studies was different (P < .001). D, Percentage of male participants included by specialty. E, Percentage of female participants included by specialty. F, Percentage of unspecified participants included by specialty. Distribution of included males, females, and unspecified participants was different by specialty (P < .001).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.
Sex Matching of Participants

Amount of sex matching in all articles (A) and by specialty (B). There is a statistically significant difference in distribution of 50% or greater matching among all specialties (P < .001).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

289 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Physician Factors That Influence End-of-Life Decisions

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Spectrum Bias

brightcove.createExperiences();