0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Minicholecystectomy:  A Safe, Cost-effective Day Surgery Procedure FREE

A. Kent Seale, MD; Walter P. Ledet Jr, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Drs Seale and Ledet are in private practice in Sulphur, La.


Arch Surg. 1999;134(3):308-310. doi:10.1001/archsurg.134.3.308.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To document effectiveness of minicholecystectomy as a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure with rapid return to work.

Design  Review of medical records.

Setting  Small community hospital.

Patients  A total of 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomies from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1997.

Intervention  Minicholecystectomy.

Main Outcome Measures  Complications, length of hospital stay, cost, and time until return to work.

Results  Of the 1207 patients who underwent minicholecystectomy, 74% were admitted for day surgery, 88% of whom were discharged in less than 12 hours, 9.3% in 24 hours or less, and 1.7% in greater than 24 hours; 0.3% were readmitted within 2 weeks. The complication rate was 0.2%; 2 cases required laparotomy, with no common duct injuries. The cost of the procedure was $435; the average time it took working patients to return to work was 11.4 days.

Conclusions  Minicholecystectomy is a safe, inexpensive day surgery method of cholecystectomy with minimal time off work after surgery.

HISTORICALLY, cholecystectomy has been done through an 8- to 12-cm incision that cuts the majority of the rectus muscle. The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989 by Dubois et al1 decreased both inpatient time and the time until return to work, but a significant number of complications resulted. In a review of 77,604 cases, Deziel et al2 reported a 1.2% instance of complications requiring laparotomy (0.6% rate of common duct injury). Fullertin and Bell3 showed complications requiring laparotomy in 2.4% of cases (0.6% bile duct injuries).

By decreasing the incision size to 4 to 7 cm, preserving the rectus muscle, and using headlights, we have reduced our operative morbidity at no increased risk to the patient. We refer to this procedure as a "minicholecystectomy." Adding local anesthesia and long-acting dexamethasone acetate further improved patient tolerance, and we were able to begin day surgery cholecystectomies in 1986. Today, with the use of minicholecystectomy techniques, the majority of our cholecystectomies are done as day surgery, with patients returning to work in 12 to 14 days. Minicholecystectomy is also very economical, costing $435 per procedure in our hospital. In this study, we report our experience with minicholecystectomy from 1986 through 1997.

We reviewed the records of all minicholecystectomies performed at West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital, Sulphur, La, between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997. We evaluated complications and length of stay in all cases. In procedures performed from January 1, 1991, through January 1, 1998, we also studied the time from surgery until the patient returned to work.

We perform minicholecystectomy much like an open cholecystectomy, except that we make a small incision, substituting retractors for hands, and preserve as much rectus muscle as possible. The surgery is done through a 4- to 7-cm incision. Essential tools for the surgery are retractors (Harrington-Pemberton 1.9- or 6.4-cm; Allegiance Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Ill, and Deaver 2.5-cm; Allegiance Healthcare Corp), a headlight, ×2.5 magnification loops, metal tonsil sucker, cautery (with extension), and 20 mg of long-acting dexamethasone acetate in 0.25% bupivacine hydrochloride with epinephrine (1 mL/kg).

A transverse incision is used 2 to 3 fingers below the xiphoid process. The gallbladder is visualized, and laparotomy sponges (Medical Action Industries, Inc, Asheville, NC) are introduced to isolate the area. Harrington retractors are then introduced, placing the wide ends (1) superolaterally to elevate the liver off of Calot triangle, (2) superomedially to create traction across the common duct, and (3) in Morrison pouch to create traction along the length of the common duct. In very obese patients, the incision is extended to 7 cm to accommodate 6.4-cm Harrington retractors. Ninety-eight percent of the dissection is done with the cautery (coagulation mode) by means of a touch and push technique. If the gallbladder is distended, it is aspirated. The Calot triangular area is dissected, with identification of the cystic artery and the cystic duct. Unless there is questionable anatomy, the cystic artery is ligated and cut. The gallbladder is then taken down from the liver bed and the cystic duct is traced down to its juncture with the common duct. If the gallbladder is inflamed and no dissection plane can be developed between the gallbladder and the liver, the gallbladder is opened. The bile and stones are removed. The margins of the gallbladder are excised at the junction of the gallbladder bed and liver, leaving the gallbladder wall in the liver. The mucosa remaining in the liver bed is cauterized. If a cholangiogram is not indicated, the cystic duct is clipped 0.5 cm from its juncture with the common duct and the gallbladder is removed. Bupivacaine with dexamethasone is introduced into the area of the surgery and meticulously injected into the wound margins.

The current average cost per procedure was determined for minicholecystectomies.

Of 1207 cholecystectomies performed (Table 1), 898 (74.4%) were in patients admitted for day surgery; 88.9% were discharged within 12 hours, 9.3% were discharged between 12 and 24 hours, and 1.8% were discharged more than 24 hours after surgery (Table 2). Three hundred nine patients underwent surgery as inpatients. Of these, 36.9% were discharged within 24 hours, and 63.1% were discharged more than 24 hours after surgery (Table 3).

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Overview of Minicholecystectomies Performed
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Minicholecystectomy: Day Surgeries
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Minicholecystectomy: Inpatient Length of Stay

All cholecystectomies, acute or elective, inpatient or outpatient, were done by 1 of the 2 of us by means of the minicholecystectomy technique. We had no procedures that required incisions greater than 7 cm. None of our patients had sufficient blood loss to require transfusions. There were no intra-abdominal abscesses. Only patients who had common duct exploration underwent drainage. We had 2 complications requiring reoperation. One patient had acute onset of abdominal pain 5 days postoperatively. She was returned to the operating room, where a leak at the site of the cystic and common duct juncture was noted. There was no residual cystic duct or clip present. A T-tube was positioned and eventually removed. The patient did well. The second patient developed pain 24 hours postoperatively. She was returned to surgery, and a similar bile duct leak was found. The site of the previous connection of the cystic duct to the common duct was sutured with two 3-0 chromic sutures. This patient also did well.

We compiled statistics on the time until the patient returned to work for patients treated since 1991. During this period there were 278 patients who worked regularly. The average time off work was 11.4 days (Table 4). The time it took for patients who performed heavy manual work to return to work was less than the time for nonmanual workers, which may indicate that desire and incentive are of equal importance or more important than surgical technique.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Time Until Return to Work by Age*

Our results confirm that the majority of minicholecystectomies can be done as outpatient surgeries. Operating room costs for laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Lake Charles Memorial Hospital averaged $1600. Those charges do not include the equipment necessary to perform laparoscopic surgery, such as scopes and cameras. Low operating room cost ($435 per procedure) for minicholecystectomy, with no increased hospital stay, results in a $1165 saving when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our complication rate requiring laparotomy of 0.2% was significantly better than those reported by Deziel et al2 (1.2%) and Fullertin and Bell3 (2.4%). We had no common duct injuries and no deaths.

The majority of articles in the literature promote laparoscopic cholecystectomy as being cost-effective because of short hospital stay and earlier return to work. Since the hospital stay cannot be shorter than that for day surgery, and our average return to work was 11 days, the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are questionable. Complication rates and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are also higher than those in our series of minicholecystectomy.

Companies that produce laparoscopic equipment market the laparoscopic technique as the newest and the best for the general population. We, as surgeons, should question why we have rushed to embrace a procedure that eliminates depth perception. Minicholecystectomy is safe, effective, and inexpensive, and should be considered for all cholecystectomies.

Reprints: A. Kent Seale, MD, 914 Cypress St, Sulphur, LA 70663.

Dubois  FBerthelot  GLevard  H Cholecystectomie par coeliospie [Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy]. Presse Med. 1989;18980- 982
Deziel  DJMillikan  KWEconomou  SGDoolas  AKo  STAiran  MC Complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;1659- 14
Link to Article
Fullertin  GMBell  G Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland: West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Gut. 1994;351121- 1126
Link to Article

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Overview of Minicholecystectomies Performed
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Minicholecystectomy: Day Surgeries
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Minicholecystectomy: Inpatient Length of Stay
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Time Until Return to Work by Age*

References

Dubois  FBerthelot  GLevard  H Cholecystectomie par coeliospie [Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy]. Presse Med. 1989;18980- 982
Deziel  DJMillikan  KWEconomou  SGDoolas  AKo  STAiran  MC Complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;1659- 14
Link to Article
Fullertin  GMBell  G Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland: West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Gut. 1994;351121- 1126
Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 32

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter 22.1. Economic Analysis

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
The Number Needed to Treat in Weighing Benefit and Harm