We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Invited Critique: Handoscopic Surgery

Manuel Trías Folch; Eduardo Ma Targarona
Arch Surg. 1999;134(5):486. doi:10.1001/archsurg.134.5.486.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The Southern Surgical Club has recruited many patients to assess the clinical utility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. This device permits the surgeon to recover the tactile feeling, maintaining the advantages of laparoscopy. The cases chosen include a variety of procedures performed and levels of complexity, which complicate analysis, as reflected by the high conversion rate (22%). Some indications are difficult to accept (eg, hiatal hernia) when results with the standard laparoscopic approach are satisfactory. The best message comes from the analysis of 2 accepted indications: colectomy and splenectomy. The results after colectomy are promising, especially when they include more difficult situations (eg, diverticulitis and intestinal fistula). The authors do not state the characteristics of spleens approached with the hand port, but 4 of 7 were benign, and they could be morcellated. The accessory incision in splenic surgery should be considered only for cases of massive spleen or for retrieval of the intact organ, and it is in this selected group of patients that use of the hand port may be beneficial. Probably the most important data of this work is the surgeon's subjective feeling that this device facilitated the procedure in 88% of cases, with a score higher than 4 on a scale from 0 to 5.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
What are the Results?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
How Strong Is the Association Between Exposure and Outcome?