0
Commentary |

Ulcer Surgery and Highly Selective Vagotomy—Y2K

Philip E. Donahue, MD
Arch Surg. 1999;134(12):1373-1377. doi:10.1001/archsurg.134.12.1373.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

WHILE ulcerations of the stomach and duodenum remained common entities in the latter half of the 20th century, the number of operations performed for ulcer declined remarkably. Medical treatments became effective as specific medications (the histamine-receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs]) eliminated the deleterious effects of intraluminal acid, greatly reducing the need for operations.1 Subsequently, bacterial infection was proven to be a major risk factor for gastric and duodenal ulcers, especially for ulcer recurrence, which was eliminated in 98% of those at risk by antibiotics directed against Helicobacter species.2,3 For the first time in history, medical treatments for ulcer were clearly more effective than ulcer operations; ulcer surgery, once the only "definitive" therapy, is perceived as a heroic intervention, reserved for patients without other alternatives.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Annual death rate by race for patients with peptic ulcer (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 531-534.9), 1979-1996.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Death rate by age group for patients with peptic ulcer (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 531-534.9).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 5

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com
brightcove.createExperiences();