Invited Critique |

The Impact of Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Ultrasound on the Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions—Invited Critique

Edward L. Bradley, MD
Arch Surg. 2000;135(3):264. doi:10.1001/archsurg.135.3.264.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Schachter and his coworkers have presented us with a small but intriguing prospective study of the value of LAPUS in assigning a specific diagnosis to lesions previously diagnosed by conventional imaging techniques as "pancreatic pseudocysts." In their series, 6 of 15 patients were significantly impacted by the additional information provided by laparoscopic ultrasound.

This article directly addresses a currently vexing clinical problem—how to make a precise diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocysts. Despite modern imaging techniques, including CT scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and EUS, a definitive diagnosis of pseudocyst may not be possible. In fact, as many as 15% of "pancreatic pseudocysts" diagnosed by conventional imaging are actually cystic neoplasms. Moreover, when other lesions of the pancreas capable of successfully masquerading as "pseudocysts," such as postnecrotic collections (necromas), cavitated tumors, and rare benign cysts are considered, the potential diagnostic error approaches 20%. It is possible, therefore, that each general surgeon over the course of a career could mistreat one of these lesions under the misdiagnosis of "pseudocyst," if internal drainage were performed. The consequences of maltreatment range from disastrous in the case of a cystic malignancy to recurrence, depending on the precise lesion present.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2

The Rational Clinical Examination
Location of Paracentesis and Ultrasound Guidance