We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence and Brief Communications |

The Learning Curve for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Richard K. Orr, MD, MPH
Arch Surg. 2000;135(5):605-606. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

I find it interesting that Dr Cody criticizes most of the assumptions of our article, yet agrees with its conclusion that surgeons should perform full axillary dissection until they have ascended the "learning curve" for sentinel node biopsy. Hopefully, I can mollify some of Cody's concerns.

Failure to Identify Sentinel Nodes. At the time our article1 was submitted, the 17 published studies (Table 1 in our article) included only 9 (53%) in which sentinel nodes were identified in 90% or more patients. These series included the surgeons' early and later operative experience. Only 6 of these series listed 50 or fewer patients, and in those 6, sentinel nodes were identified 66% to 92% of the time (weighted average, 86%). I suspect that the occasional operator, especially in institutions without good nuclear medicine support, will perform at a level closer to the early experience cited in our article (references 5 and 7) than the later publications described by Cody. A recent publication from a multidisciplinary breast center (with good support) noted that the sentinel node was identified in 73% of their first 44 cases.2

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles