Invited Critique |

Nonoperative Management of Splenic Injuries—Invited Critique

Lewis Flint, MD
Arch Surg. 2000;135(6):681. doi:10.1001/archsurg.135.6.681.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Recognition of the important functions of the spleen in children led to nonoperative methods for the management of spleen injuries more than 2 decades ago. Improvements in computed tomography and, more recently, ultrasound techniques for the detection of intra-abdominal bleeding and organ injury have joined with improved monitoring and critical care to make nonoperative management of most spleen and liver injuries in patients of all ages a clinical reality. Advanced interventional radiology procedures are now available, which offer ways to stop bleeding and deal with postinjury abscesses and fluid collections. That nonoperative therapy of spleen injuries is one of the accepted standards of spleen injury care is an unassailable truth. On the other hand, the article by Velmahos and colleagues serves to remind us that our knowledge is not complete regarding spleen injuries, and that dangerous failures of management can occur. The failure rate and the patterns of failure have been nagging, troublesome questions for clinicians dealing with spleen injuries in adults. Higher injury grade, a large volume of extrasplenic blood seen on computed tomographic scan, comorbid diseases, and the need for transfusion are factors statistically predictive of the failure of nonoperative management, and this has been confirmed by Velmahos and coauthors.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles