Invited Critique |

Surgical Treatment and Outcomes in Carcinoma of the Extrahepatic Bile Ducts—Invited Critique

Gerald W. Peskin, MD
Arch Surg. 2001;136(2):215. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.2.215.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Like many other reports in the literature of the 1990s, this study of 77 patients with carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts expresses the opinion that an aggressive surgical approach to these lesions can result in a higher percentage of long-term survivors with modest perioperative morbidity and mortality.

By "aggressive in approach," one implies adequate preoperative assessment using computed tomography scans, duplex ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and angiography as needed to establish a staging system that will refine the operative intervention of those individuals who can undergo curative resection. Furthermore, for those lesions involving the confluence of the hepatic ducts, the real decision area of cholangiocarcinoma, aggressiveness means the ability and willingness to resect segments of the liver (the caudate lobe in particular) to achieve negative margins and a reasonable long-term survival. While the Rochester group's series confirms 1990s results, only 2 patients underwent hepatic resection, and only 9 of 45 patients with hilar lesions were resected for cure. Knowing that surgical excision is the only effective means of prolonging the life of these patients, today's surgeons should strive for at least 70% resectability by extending the operation in keeping with the natural history of this tumor.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles