Invited Critique |

Characteristics of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer Predict Further Involvement of Higher-Echelon Nodes in the Axilla—Invited Critique

Kirby I. Bland, MD
Arch Surg. 2001;136(6):692. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.6.692.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Kamath and associates determined that characteristics of the SLN confirm the need to complete axillary nodal staging procedures. This is the first paper that provides objective data showing that examination of the SLN with serial sectioning and cytokeratin staining will identify patients with low tumor volume. Further, the authors confirm that metastatic tumor deposits are confined to 92% of SLN evaluations.

Traditional approaches suggest that the status of the axillary lymphatic system is best determined by complete axillary LND, which has evolved from a comprehensive (level I-III; Patey) LND to the Auchincloss-Madden (levels I-II) nodal sampling technique.1 The advent of SLN mapping, championed by Giuliano et al, has more recently been confirmed to be a highly efficacious method for determining pathological regional lymph node status; the technique ensures morbidity much lower than that achieved with partial or complete axillary LND.1 The significance of this study by Kamath et al suggests that primary tumor size and tumor volume in the SLN are predictors of the incidence of non-SLN metastases in the nodal basin. Further, the method for detecting micrometastases is increasingly evident as a principle for detecting involvement of contiguous non-SLN. Thus, the present study confirms the findings of the John Wayne Cancer Center, that tumor volume in the SLN is predictive of non-SLN involvement.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles