We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Internationalization of General Surgical Journals—Invited Critique

Leigh Delbridge, MD
Arch Surg. 2001;136(12):1352. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.12.1352.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The article by Tompkins and colleagues describes changes in national content for the 6 top English-language general surgical journals. The most striking finding is the increasing internationalization of content. In the United States, for example, the number of national articles decreased from 87.5% to 68.8% throughout 15 years and constituted the minority of freely submitted articles in 3 journals. Likewise, the number of national articles decreased in the one British journal from 74.8% to 47.1%. The authors raise the question of whether reduced research funding is a significant factor in the decreasing number of national articles. It is much more likely that the phenomenon is simply the direct result of globalization of surgical communication, a point acknowledged by the authors. Surgical researchers in Europe and Asia are now fully aware of the need for their work to be published in an English-language journal to receive international recognition. It is self-evident that these 6 journals will increasingly attract articles from the world's foremost surgical researchers, a change that can only be beneficial for the international fellowship of surgery. It is not necessary to assume that the quality of national surgical research is suffering; it is simply facing greater competition as the result of the globalization of surgery.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles