0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

Arch Surg. 2001;136(12):1342. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.12.1342.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In reviewing the major American and British surgical journals throughout a 15-year period (1983-1998) for the absolute number of articles and the proportion of national and international papers published, it has become apparent that internationalization has occurred. Asian and European manuscripts showed the most striking increase in all journals, with national papers down by 19% among American monthlies and by 28% in the British Journal of Surgery. The number of basic research papers declined by 15% in US surgical journals, with a simultaneous 2.4% decrease in government funding. Is this a result of multiple new specialty journals siphoning away our national output? Is it closely related to the national government funding reduction? Is it part and parcel of the pressures of managed care on many academic faculty members? Or is it an example of the globalization process we see all around us in other professionals and markets? Dr Tompkins and his group, representing American academia; Dr Bernard F. Ribeiro, a distinguished British surgeon; and Dr Leigh Delbridge of Sydney, Australia, present their analyses. Surely, after reviewing all of this, one can formulate his or her own opinion. Let us hear from you!

TEACHING AND LEARNING EVIDENCE-BASED SURGICAL PRACTICE: A TALE OF 3 TEXANS

Dr Lewis Flint's reminiscence regarding surgeons who helped him understand evidence-based surgical practice deserves mention for its warmth and logic as its author looks at both sides of the issue. Emphasis is placed on a commitment to mastery of the surgical scientific literature and synthesizing it with keeping track of one's own results and listening to each patient. We need to recognize that evidence-based medicine is a fact of our clinical lives.

DYNAMIC RETENTION: A TECHNIQUE FOR CLOSURE OF THE COMPLEX ABDOMEN IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

With the advent of more violent trauma and bigger operations, the closure of the complex abdomen following massive intra-abdominal swelling and compartment syndrome is a real challenge. In this article, Koniaris and associates at the University of Rochester (Rochester, NY) provide us with a modified technique enabling all the advantages of delayed primary closure, as well as the ability to reapproximate the abdominal fascia at the bedside, without herniation or fistulization. This permits great latitude in the management of the difficult abdomen. (See also Dr Lucas' Invited Critique.)

THE FREY PROCEDURE: LOCAL RESECTION OF PANCREATIC HEAD COMBINED WITH LATERAL PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY

For those who believe that ductal drainage is the procedure of choice for the complications of chronic pancreatitis, Drs Ho and Frey re-emphasize the value of Dr Frey's procedure in affording relief to those unfortunate individuals. The technique is beautifully described in this paper, along with appropriate illustrations. Reference is made to the excellent results achieved.

SURGERY FOR ULCERATIVE COLITIS IN ELDERLY PERSONS: CHANGES IN INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY AND OUTCOME OVER TIME

This lucid article points out the change in indications for the surgical intervention for ulcerative colitis in elderly persons, from toxic megacolon and carcinoma to treatment-refractory disease and dysplasia. Mortality and morbidity markedly decreased.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.