Surgery for Graves disease, which was once widely practiced in North America, has become rather uncommon. Because even women of child-bearing age and children are often treated with radioiodine, the current indications for thyroidectomy in Graves disease are limited to the following: patients who have failed antithyroid drug or radioiodine treatment, those who require a rapid and definitive reversal of hyperthyroidism (eg, during pregnancy), or those who have an aversion to irradiation. Finally, thyroidectomy should be used in patients who have Graves disease with a concomitant thyroid nodule that should be removed to rule out a potential malignancy. The shift to radioiodine therapy has occurred because it is less expensive, less invasive, and relatively safe: avoiding the main surgical complications of hyperparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Clearly, Huang et al have experience in treating Graves disease that is unmatched by any endocrine surgeon in North America. The ability of Huang and coworkers to amass 52 patients in a 7-month period indicates a major philosophical difference in the management of Graves disease in Asia.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Surgery editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2
The Rational Clinical Examination
Location of Paracentesis and Ultrasound Guidance
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.