0
Special Feature |

Image of the Month—Diagnosis FREE

[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: Grace S. Rozycki, MD

More Author Information
Arch Surg. 2003;138(6):682. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.6.681.
Text Size: A A A
Published online
Figures in this Article

Figure 1 Computed tomographic scan of the abdomen, showing "bowel within bowel," typical of intussusception.

Figure 2 Operative picture after the intussusception had been reduced. Note the dimple in the terminal ileum (indicated by the hemostat), the site of an invaginated Meckel diverticulum (as shown in the inset). This was the main point of intussusception.

A 20-YEAR-OLD, emaciated man came to the emergency department with recurrent right lower quadrant pain and diarrhea. The patient had been having similar episodes for the past 5 years and was seen in several hospitals. He had recently been referred to a psychiatrist for these symptoms. A physical examination revealed a thin, cachectic individual, underdeveloped for his age, with tenderness in the right lower quadrant without peritoneal signs. A vague "fullness" was appreciated in the right upper quadrant. Laboratory results were within normal limits. A computed tomographic scan was obtained (Figure 2).

The abdominal computed tomographic scan indicated an intussusception starting in the ileum and progressing toward the transverse colon. On operation, the terminal ileum was found intussuscepting into the cecum up to the transverse colon. This was carefully reduced. The terminal ileum was dusky and ecchymotic and showed an area of dimpling, with a palpable mass within the lumen. This was resected, and an ileo-ileostomy was performed. The operative specimen showed an invaginated, gangrenous Meckel diverticulum that acted as the lead point for the intussusception (Figure 2). On histopathologic examination, the Meckel diverticulum was infarcted and perforated, with gastric foveolar metaplasia. The patient recovered uneventfully and, at last follow-up, was gaining weight rapidly.

In a 1978 Japanese literature review of 600 patients with Meckel diverticulum, intussusception was reported in 13.7% of 287 symptomatic patients.1 In adults, intussusception is secondary to small bowel tumors, polyps, or Meckel diverticulum. The signs and symptoms are vague and, as in this patient, chronic, recurrent abdominal pain due to attacks of intussusception may be misdiagnosed as a psychiatric disorder. The radiologic features on computed tomography are suggestive, as demonstrated by this patient. In a 30-year experience reported from Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston),2 there were 58 cases of surgically proven adult intussusception. Ninety-three percent of the intussusceptions were associated with a pathologic lesion; 44% with an enteric lesion; and 14% with a colonic lesion. Forty-eight percent of the enteric lesions were malignant and 52% were benign. This report concluded that surgical resection of the intussusception without reduction is the preferred treatment in adults.

Corresponding author: Rao R. Ivatury, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E Broad St W15E, Richmond, VA 23298.

Yahchouchy  EKMarano  AFEtienne  JFFingerhut  A Meckel's diverticulum. J AmColl Surg. 2001;192658- 662
Azar  TBerger  DL Adult intussusception. Ann Surg. 1997;226134- 138

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Yahchouchy  EKMarano  AFEtienne  JFFingerhut  A Meckel's diverticulum. J AmColl Surg. 2001;192658- 662
Azar  TBerger  DL Adult intussusception. Ann Surg. 1997;226134- 138

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com