0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: Gerald W. Peskin, MD


Arch Surg. 2003;138(9):939. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.9.939.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

We are in the midst of a laparoscopy explosion in general surgery. Two articles relate to some problem areas of this technique. The first, by Berguer and colleagues, is an ergonomic study of the labor or physical effort required for laparoscopic maneuvering as opposed to an open procedure in the art of knot tying. They concluded that complex manipulative tasks using laparoscopic instrumentation require substantially higher upper extremity muscle effort compared with open surgery. This increased workload is often accompanied by an increase in the subjective discomfort of the surgeon in the affected areas—food for thought.

See Article

Second, Podnos and colleagues have reviewed the literature regarding the complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass (3464 cases). They found that the type and frequency of postoperative complications after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass are different. Laparoscopic operations were associated with a higher frequency of early and late bowel obstruction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and stomal stenosis, whereas the open bypass was plagued by iatrogenic splenectomy, wound infection, incisional hernia, and mortality. The authors believe that part of the difference regarding laparoscopy is related to the learning curve of this complex procedure. This article provides an interesting analysis.

See Article

Another interesting concept is seen in the work of Vila and colleagues who studied the comparative outcome of procedures performed in physicians' offices as opposed to ambulatory surgery centers. They found an approximately 10-fold increased risk of adverse incidents and death in the office setting.

See Article

PAPERS FROM THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION IMPROVED SURVIVAL FOR ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE AMPULLA OF VATER: FIFTY-FIVE CONSECUTIVE RESECTIONS

This team from the University of California, Los Angeles, describes a consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing Whipple procedures for ampullary adenocarcinoma from 1998 through 2001. They demonstrate an improved survival of 10% to 20%, perhaps related in part to adjuvant treatment. The major factor associated with prolonged survival was the absence of perineural invasion in the resected tumor specimen.

See Article

UTILITY OF TUMOR MARKERS IN DETERMINING RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC CANCER

Always alert to new methods of ruling out operation for patients with pancreatic cancer that has spread beyond areas of resection, this group from the University of California, Davis, noted a correlation between high serum levels of CA19-9 and unresectable disease in 89 patients. The authors suggest that patients with high levels of this antigen might benefit from additional staging modalities such as diagnostic laparoscopy to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.

See Article

PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT INFLUENCE ON SURGERY RESIDENTS

A good deal of discussion was prompted by the introduction of physician assistants into a plan to create a positive effect on graduate medical education and resident hours and activities. This group at the University of California, San Francisco–East Bay found that physician assistants can positively influence all aspects of resident work and education.

See Article

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.