We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Invited Critique |

Predictive Factors for Successful Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura—Invited Critique

Manuel Trias, MD, PhD; Eduard Ma. Targarona
Arch Surg. 2004;139(1):66. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.1.66.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


There has been a slow but steady change in attitude toward the application of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of certain infrequent diseases for which surgery used to be considered an excessively aggressive alternative to medical or less invasive approaches. This change has had a great effect on the treatment policy for diseases such as achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and ITP. Once the feasibility and safety of the minimally invasive surgical alternative was demonstrated, the new-approach old-procedure surgery reclaimed its place as first-line therapy. This has been the case with LS for ITP, as recent reports demonstrate.15 Another advantage of LS is a "revisiting effect"; many of the surgical aspects of these diseases have been reanalyzed. For example, when the surgical approach is proposed as first-line treatment, it is investigated for its ability to replace the open approach on a long-term basis. Another aspect is how to select or predict the outcome of LS, especially in the context of a disease in which there are many dark areas and in which the result is still not entirely predictable.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles