Invited Critique |

Racial Disparities in Rectal Cancer Treatment—Invited Critique

Michael J. Stamos, MD
Arch Surg. 2004;139(2):156. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.2.156.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Significant variation in the care of the patient with rectal cancer has been noted by numerous authors.1,2 Variations based on surgical subspecialization, hospital volumes, and surgeon volumes have all been subject to intense scrutiny. Morris and colleagues looked at the treatment of the patient with rectal cancer, using the SEER database, and found significant differences based on the patient's race. Specifically, they found that sphincter salvage procedures were less likely to be applied to African American patients than to white patients. Additionally, the authors found that most white and African American patients did not receive radiation therapy for stage II to III rectal cancer, contrary to the 1990 National Institutes of Health consensus conference, with African Americans again being less likely than whites to receive radiation therapy. I found this article to be interesting and thought provoking. In recent years, the medical literature has been relatively replete with subanalyses of large publicly available databases such as SEER. These large databases have inherent strengths (mainly in their large numbers), and they have inherent weaknesses, some of which are highlighted by this article. To begin with, the authors imply that physicians are consciously or subconsciously treating African American patients differently from white patients (note specifically their concluding sentence). They seem to believe that a physician would treat a patient with an abdominoperineal resection vs a low anterior resection simply because the patient is African American rather than white. On the surface, this is insulting, particularly to a physician who has spent more than a decade of his career treating patients at a large, county-run teaching hospital that focuses on the care of indigent and minority patients. A far more likely explanation is that socioeconomic factors and surgeons' specialization affected the outcomes observed in the SEER database. This difference has been observed by others.1,3,4 Further influencing factors may have been hospital volume and/or the treating surgeons' volume of cases, which have also been shown to influence the rate of sphincter-sparing procedures.2

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles