0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: Gerald W. Peskin, MD
Section Editor: Gerald W. Peskin, MD


Arch Surg. 2004;139(5):465. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.5.465.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

PAPERS OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION ACHALASIA TREATMENT: IMPROVED OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC MYOTOMY WITH OPERATIVE MANOMETRY

In an attempt to prevent residual esophagogastric junction high pressure, signifying incomplete myotomy, Chapman et al suggest operative manometry to identify the problem and correct it at the time of the initial surgery.

RESIDENT WORK HOURS: WHAT THEY ARE REALLY DOING

The 80-hour workweek has forced surgical residency programs to reexamine call schedules, monitor duty hours, and grapple with the financial burden of a reduced resident workforce. At the same time, programs are instituting efforts to ensure resident competence in accordance with the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education outcomes project. Brasel et al surveyed their resident staff and found that residents spent a large amount of time in noneducational activities. Eliminating a significant percentage of this time would bring all our rotations into compliance without major restructuring.

NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: EXPERIENCE AT A SINGLE INSTITUTION

At a tertiary care university medical center, a retrospective study was performed of 123 patients treated for carcinoma of the esophagus; 31 received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, 27 underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, and 65 underwent surgery alone. Malaisrie et al found that neoadjuvant chemoradiation effectively downstaged patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer with a trend at 3 years toward significance.

Several controversies have arisen regarding this month's articles. The first of these deals with the question of the quality of life after bile duct injury as part of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This type of injury is still occurring. The article by Moore et alArticlefrom Vanderbilt University differs from that of Sarmiento et alArticleof the Mayo Clinic. Sarmiento et al feel that when properly repaired, with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up, the quality of life compares favorably with both those undergoing uneventful cholecystectomy and national norms, but Moore et al found that after bile duct injury and repair, there are long-term detrimental effects, including lawsuits.

Second, the question of the appropriate examination for acute appendicitis raises its head. Mittal et al evaluated 91 patients with an uncertain diagnosis of acute appendicitis divided into a group of 52 undergoing a triple-contrast computed tomographic scan (oral, lower gastrointestinal tract, and intravenous) and 39 undergoing a new focused computed tomographic scan with rectal contrast only. The groups were otherwise similar. The results in terms of cost, negative appendectomy rate, tolerance level by patients, decreased time delay to diagnosis, and perforation rate all favored the focused rectal-contrast-only route.

Finally, should aldosteronomas be used as a beginning for performing laparoscopic adrenalectomy to avoid the potential pitfalls associated with adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas? Kim et al argue that this is a reasonable approach.

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.