0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
This Month in Archives of Surgery |

This Month in Archives of Surgery FREE

[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: Gerald W. Peskin, MD


Arch Surg. 2004;139(11):1145. doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1145.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Three articles this month deal with complications of operative techniques. The first of these is the routine cholecystectomy performed by laparoscopic means. As the authors state, about 40% of iatrogenic injury occurs in the operating room. To combat this problem and provide awareness of it, Tang et al applied the Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment to an analysis of 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 26 surgeons and found that the error rate could be documented by this program, as wellas the stage of the operation where the errors were enacted most frequently (the hazard zone).

See Article

Using 107 patients in each limb of the study, Kikuchi et al noted that the complication rate for patients with radiation-induced neoplasms was equivalent to that for patients without a history of radiation. The low long-term complication rate helps support prophylactic total thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid nodules and a history of radiation exposure.

See Article

Everyone is cognizant of the problems related to the efficiency of institutions and its effect on error production. Friedman and Berger surveyed teamwork initiatives and their effect on specific variables related to patient care. The belief was that length of stay would be significantly decreased without compromising the quality of patient care.

See Article

COMPARISON OF A NEW FIBRIN SEALANT WITH STANDARD TOPICAL HEMOSTATIC AGENTS

This multicenter study suggests an advance that may prove useful to all general surgeons who tackle liver problems, including metastases and trauma. A new hemostatic agent will soon be available that proved superior to old methods of hemostasis for liver problems. It reduced the time required to achieve hemostasis and produced fewer complications related to its use.

See Article

MULTICENTER, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN VS ANTERIOR 90° PARTIAL FUNDOPLICATION

This Australian study defies a previous American review of the type of fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. At 6-month follow-up, they found that a 90° partial anterior fundoplication was followed by fewer adverse effects than a full Nissen and achieves a higher rate of satisfaction with the overall results. However, this offset to some extent is neutralized by a greater likelihood of recurrent reflux symptoms.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 9. Outcome, Satisfaction, and Visick Grading*

See Article

IMPACT OF PRIMARY RESECTION ON THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH PERFORATED DIVERTICULITIS

This study from Chandra et al, though colored by confusing nomenclature and various categories of patients, does illustrate the current trend toward resectional therapy for diverticulitis and left colon lesions in general, as opposed to drainage and colostomy. Primary resection has become the standard practice for patients with generalized peritonitis-complicating diverticulitis even with advanced age and other combined factors present. Perhaps, as this article suggests, we need to focus on medical management of the comorbid conditions and systemic manifestations of sepsis.

See Article

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 9. Outcome, Satisfaction, and Visick Grading*

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.